Thank you, Jan. That is exactly correct: this content was marked with CC
license.
The meeting will be recorded, and available later on the same link. Anyone
will be able to watch it afterwards, and leave comments if you have
questions.
On Oct 9, 2017 18:11, "Jan Ainali" wrote:
> 2017-10-09 22:4
Hi Erik,
Really meaty post. Great stuff. Comments below.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
> > ... and it will all become one free mush everyone copies to make a buck.
> We
> > are already in a situation today where a
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:43 AM, James Salsman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Leinonen Teemu
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is super interesting and important discussion. One idea.
> >
> >> On 10 Oct 2017, at 3.44, Erik Moeller wrote:
> >> And for most of the sources amalgamated i
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call information from Wikimedia projects a "mush", but I
> think it's a good term for the proprietary amalgamation of information
> and data from many sources, often without any regard for the
> reliability of the source
Is t
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Leinonen Teemu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is super interesting and important discussion. One idea.
>
>> On 10 Oct 2017, at 3.44, Erik Moeller wrote:
>> And for most of the sources amalgamated in this manner, if provenance
>> is indicated at all, we don't find any o
Hi all,
This is super interesting and important discussion. One idea.
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 3.44, Erik Moeller wrote:
> And for most of the sources amalgamated in this manner, if provenance
> is indicated at all, we don't find any of the safeguards we have for
> Wikimedia content (revisioning,