Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thanks, likes and progress on Wikimedia Discourse pilot

The instance is back up after a labs admin restarted the instance for me. Everything started correctly on boot as expected. On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:44 PM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Lodewijk > wrote: > > Is

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thanks, likes and progress on Wikimedia Discourse pilot

ers of wikimedia-l, > > > > > > One of the outcomes of the 'better thankspam' thread was to experiment > > with > > > a pilot installationg of Discourse. This has been set up at > > > https://discourse.wmflabs.org/ by Erik Bernhardson. > > > In the past weeks a

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Piloting a Discourse installation for discussion (was: Better thankspam)

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Milos Rancic wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Andrea Zanni > wrote: > > Why? > > As a user, you would just need to login and participate, Discourse is > like > > a website. You don't need to install

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Piloting a Discourse installation for discussion (was: Better thankspam)

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Erik Bernhardson > <ebernhard...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > FWIW, there is a docker role in wikimedia puppet and it's already used as > > part of the labs inf

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Discourse installation

This test instance is not yet using OAuth to utilize SUL credentials. Discourse only supports OAuth2, and MediaWiki only supports OAuth1, so some engineering time needs to be spent to build a bridge between the two. For now, with the test, you will need to create a new account. On Wed, Mar 2,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Draft Code of Conduct for Technical Spaces

). Is this the community you are referring to? > The fact that some people have participated on specific parts does not > negate the need for ratification of the full and final version. Work on > individual sections hammers out what you're going to present to the > community

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Draft Code of Conduct for Technical Spaces

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Pine W wrote: > > A point I should make is that I think that Matthew and others made some > good-faith efforts with the current draft. I would have proposed far less > WMF involvement with the draft One thing I just don't understand here,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Draft Code of Conduct for Technical Spaces

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rogol Domedonfors wrote: > This code has been under discussion at > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft since the summer > of 2015, and is finally nearing completion. The original consensus in 2015 > had been that the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New functionality: cross-wiki search results

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > Is Wikidata information included? > Thanks, > GerardM > > Currently that is not part of the plan, this is specifically addressing sister wikis, such as frwikivoyage, frwikiquote, frwiki,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Update on Discovery search efforts and upcoming releases

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Deborah Tankersley < dtankers...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > It's just searching on Wikipedia for now, as the Structured Data project on > Commons is just ramping up. > > Also for some clarity, most of the improvements are not limited to wikipedias, for