Re: [Wikimedia-l] Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

[Marc-Andre]

It seems to me obvious that the survey is designed specifically to get 
enough data to decide on the future status of Flow development? I'd 
expect that the answer to "whether Flow is alive or dead" will be very 
much contingent on the survey itself.


On 2016-09-06 02:32 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:

It's quite odd to have a survey published about something that's been
declared defunct (albeit unconvincingly).


-- Marc


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FW: My final email

[Marc-Andre]

On 2016-08-17 06:13 AM, Peter Southwood wrote:


Problem? Vague and unspecific information and suggestion of possible 
unspecified consequences. Unfortunately this is the kind of language I have 
come to expect from Jimmy, and why I don't take anything he writes at face 
value.


The problem of that page's wording being rather vague and unclear about 
what, exactly, you'd unsubscribe from is a genuine issue that needs 
fixin' (that is, while what the intent is would be clear to technically 
savvy people as illustrated by the responses on this very thread, it 
clearly needs to be wordsmithed into making more sense).


That said, I'm pretty sure absolutely nobody sane believes Jimmy 
personally sits down and writes bits of web interface used by 
fundraising, so the dig at his expense is not only gratuitous, but 
detracts from any point you were trying to make.


-- Coren / Marc


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,