It seems to me obvious that the survey is designed specifically to get
enough data to decide on the future status of Flow development? I'd
expect that the answer to "whether Flow is alive or dead" will be very
much contingent on the survey itself.
On 2016-09-06 02:32 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On 2016-08-17 06:13 AM, Peter Southwood wrote:
Problem? Vague and unspecific information and suggestion of possible
unspecified consequences. Unfortunately this is the kind of language I have
come to expect from Jimmy, and why I don't take anything he writes at face
value.
The problem of
