Hello again, everyone.
I'd like to respond to some questions, asked on and off list:
1. In the instructions, I described getting a group of people together to
discuss the group's capacities before submitting assessments. The model I
had in mind was informal user groups, or volunteer-only
I agree with Tomasz that some UI love would be beneficial. I think that
simplification of the language for people who are not native English
speakers might also be beneficial.
As I said before, I like the general concept. If affiliates and online
communities can be persuaded to use this tool or
Interesting idea - but is it possible to make the table a bit more
user-friendly?
First of all is too long in horizontal axis - even in large resolution I
see only 1/2 of it on my screen, and due to its structure - it is not
possible to edit it in visual editor...
2018-01-15 22:59 GMT+01:00
Interesting. The patterns that appear from this exercise could be
informative. I took a brief look at the tool and I think that it could be a
valuable opportunity for reflection by affiliates, particularly the more
complex ones and the ones that foresee themselves growing in complexity in
the near
Dear Wikimedians,
*How many Wikimedia communities have embraced advanced Wikidata use? How
many have active social media accounts, and are there geographic or
cultural patterns to which groups have and have not? Which groups have a
written, current strategy? What are the most common gaps in
