I would suggest to conduct them on Wikiversity, where people can collaborate on
research projects in the same way that make Wikipedia a place no one is going
to take an encyclopedic article seriously. 😉
Le 29 août 2018 22:21:08 GMT+02:00, Robert Fernandez a
écrit :
>Interesting metrics and ide
Interesting metrics and ideas here, but nobody's going to take your
research particularly seriously if you choose to post it in an open
sewer. I'd suggest a Medium or Wordpress blog.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:44 AM sashi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I thought I would ask if any of the junior or senior
Hi, you might be interested in "Getting to the Source":
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2491064
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Heather_Ford/publication/262291510_Getting_to_the_source_where_does_Wikipedia_get_its_information_from/links/56cfed9508aeb52500c9b44a/Getting-to-the-source-where-
Hi Sashi,
I think that there is a research project regarding Wikipedia sources in the
WMF Annual Plan for this fiscal year. I believe that the Head of the
Wikipedia Library, Jake Orlowitz, is involved. I suggest that you reach out
to him at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ocaasi_(WMF).
Also, I
Hello,
I thought I would ask if any of the junior or senior researchers here on
this mailing list have conducted previous inquiries into Wikipedia's
sourcing.
I am currently working on a project of determining what proportion of
Wikipedia is sourced to newspapers, the military, the Church, s
