Put a big red notice in the old images page descriptions saying that the
logo is deprecated and that the new logo is available in [link to the new
version]. So when people click on them from Google, they will read it.
2013/12/20 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
Hallo.
The old
Most news agencies don't just go to the web for their images due to
copyright reasons.
They will have a media collection system that they have the logo stored in.
So the best response would be for the Media Relations/Comms teams to
actually contact them and request they use the updated logo.
Well, one thing we did was actually retiring the old logo, just few
months ago. :)
Odder provided no less than 108 Wikipedias with a v2 logo.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2013-May/031550.html
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
On Dec 20, 2013 1:58 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Most news agencies don't just go to the web for their images due to
copyright reasons.
They will have a media collection system that they have the logo stored
in.
That is no doubt true for major media corporations, but a lot of
On 20 December 2013 22:02, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Can we do anything about it? My SEO skills are about non-existent. A
Facebook friend suggested changing the title of the Commons file
File:Wikipedia-logo.png to File:Wikipedia-logo-v1.png and
Svip, 20/12/2013 23:27:
Looking at the Google results, the first two are from Wikipedia (and
these are the old logo), but from the articles [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia
logos]] and [[Logo of Wikipedia]]. Both of which still includes the
old logo.
I think the article(s) in question might be key to
