Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012

2012-06-26 Thread ENWP Pine
Maryana, thank you. For anyone else who's following this, my understanding that the wikistats fixes are complete, including http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors_target and http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors. Pine __

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012

2012-06-25 Thread Maryana Pinchuk
com/blog/2012/06/wikistats-editor-counts-are-broken/ > > Sorry for the confusion and inconvenience. > > Erik Zachte > > -Original Message- > From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org > [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of ENWP Pine > S

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012

2012-06-17 Thread ENWP Pine
] On Behalf Of ENWP Pine Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:20 PM To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012 Tilman, Thanks for the report. I would like to suggest that for the foreseeable future (not just for June), these monthly reports should

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012

2012-06-17 Thread Erik Zachte
-Original Message- From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of ENWP Pine Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:20 PM To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012 Tilman, Thanks for the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012

2012-06-17 Thread ENWP Pine
Tilman, Thanks for the report. I would like to suggest that for the foreseeable future (not just for June), these monthly reports should include a fuller set of updates on the editor engagement and retention efforts. My understanding is that this is a high priority effort for WMF, it seems to