Maryana, thank you.
For anyone else who's following this, my understanding that the wikistats
fixes are complete, including
http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors_target and
http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors.
Pine
@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012
Message-ID: 004b01cd4cca$1ae54430$50afcc90$@wikimedia.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It may well be that the trends are distorted due to major bug in wikistats.
That bug has been isolated, but we need
Tilman,
Thanks for the report.
I would like to suggest that for the foreseeable future (not just for June),
these monthly reports should include a fuller set of updates on the editor
engagement and retention efforts. My understanding is that this is a high
priority effort for WMF, it seems
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of ENWP Pine
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:20 PM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012
Tilman,
Thanks
@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Report, May 2012
Message-ID: 004b01cd4cca$1ae54430$50afcc90$@wikimedia.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It may well be that the trends are distorted due to major bug in wikistats.
That bug has been isolated, but we need 7
