Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-10 Thread MF-Warburg
gt; > Could I quote PAS2050 as it isn't peer reviewed? > > Best wishes > > Geoff > > - Original message - > From: James Salsman > To: Wikimedia Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia. > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:37:49

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-10 Thread Geoff Beacon
x27;t peer reviewed? Best wishes Geoff - Original message - From: James Salsman To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia. Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:37:49 +0800 > "The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints". > What

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-10 Thread James Salsman
> "The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints". > What do you mean by that? Even those who fight for inclusion of the facts about climate change on Wikipedia aren't very likely to follow the peer reviewed secondary literature when it comes to reporting the extent of changes in ex

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-09 Thread Tim Starling
Please either turn off digests and reply to the individual list mails, or use the NNTP interface at gmane.org, so that your Subject and References headers will be correct and threading will work. On 09/10/13 20:48, Geoff Beacon wrote: > The work of Adrian Mitchell that I used was in a report to th

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-09 Thread James Salsman
Geoff, The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints suggests that you should seek assistance at the Teahouse before proceeding with further editing on the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse Tim Starling wrote: >... http://www.greenrationbook.org.uk/resources

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Southwood
PM Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia. An authoritative and easy to used resource giving of the effect or our everyday activities is essential if voters are to know enough to influence politics. I cant find any entries on Wikipedia to match this. To some extent I blame Wikipedia'

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-08 Thread Tim Starling
On 09/10/13 06:49, Geoff Beacon wrote: > An authoritative and easy to used resource giving of the effect or > our everyday activities is essential if voters are to know enough > to influence politics. > > I cant find any entries on Wikipedia to match this. To some extent > I blame Wikipedia's over

[Wikimedia-l] Carbon footprints on Wikipedia.

2013-10-08 Thread Geoff Beacon
An authoritative and easy to used resource giving of the effect or our everyday activities is essential if voters are to know enough to influence politics. I cant find any entries on Wikipedia to match this. To some extent I blame Wikipedia's over emphasis on peer review and official sources. Th