On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Fæ wrote:
> The bizarre part of this is that the charity you are currently
> chairman of, does not do any meaningful checks on members when they
> join (for five quid).
>
> The fact remains that only one person is excluded from membership,
> voting or taking part
Hi All,
Despite Fae’s attempt to derail the conversation and make this all about him
(which I am guessing it isn’t) I would like to applaud this initiative.
I hope that in the coming months you can keep us all up to date on your
experiences. All of the movement entities are struggling to find m
The bizarre part of this is that the charity you are currently
chairman of, does not do any meaningful checks on members when they
join (for five quid).
The fact remains that only one person is excluded from membership,
voting or taking part in advisory committees, and as a previous
chairman of th
Of course you don't need to be a member to volunteer with us or to be
part of this or any other consultation. There are only a very few
things that are restricted to members or that need member support, for
example borrowing our equipment and handling the charity's money.
Michael
Fæ
Do you have to be a paid up member of the charity to be part of the
consultation or the envisaged interest groups?
As last year you changed the charity policies to limit all equipment
to paid members only, which caused WM-LGBT+ a pointless degree of
hassle to even borrowing a projector, I presume
Dear movement colleagues
I thought you might like to hear about a new WMUK initiative, following
on from our recently-completed staff restructure. We are hopeful our
local community will react positively to much greater levels of
volunteer engagement.
Our initiative might be of interest to