Re: [Wikimedia-l] IdeaLab (it was: Office hour inside out (program evaluation)) Re:

[Oliver Keyes]

We are working on building a more coherent discussion system - see
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/FlowPortal

On 27 March 2013 17:39, Everton Zanella Alvarenga  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for sharing the IdeaLab portal. [1] I didn't know it, although
> I knew portals and individual inside him, like the Individual
> Engagement Grants. I don't have time now to make longer comments, but
> two questions:
>
> 1) Is there a possibility for thie committee to be more open, like the
> WMF grants program? [2]
>
> 2) Isn't time for we think out of the box, I mean, out of the wiki and
> try technologies that can foster the community evaluation of
> projetcs/idea and discussions? I know the question is too general, but
> recently, for isntance, I thought about using a reddit like system for
> the Portuguese Wikipedia village pump for the community distringuish
> try to distinguish what is good or not. I mentioned something like All
> Our Ideas once , but I think there are
> other things worth trying, if possible.
>
> P. S. Just look the discussion system inside a wiki. Damn.
>
> Tom
>
> [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab
> [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jessie Wild  wrote:
>
> > Any initial thoughts on how to maximize the effectiveness of those two
> > ideas (IdeaLab and Learning Portal)?
>
>
> --
> Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
> "A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful
> than a life spent doing nothing."
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>



-- 
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

[Wikimedia-l] IdeaLab (it was: Office hour inside out (program evaluation)) Re:

[Everton Zanella Alvarenga]

Hi,

thanks for sharing the IdeaLab portal. [1] I didn't know it, although
I knew portals and individual inside him, like the Individual
Engagement Grants. I don't have time now to make longer comments, but
two questions:

1) Is there a possibility for thie committee to be more open, like the
WMF grants program? [2]

2) Isn't time for we think out of the box, I mean, out of the wiki and
try technologies that can foster the community evaluation of
projetcs/idea and discussions? I know the question is too general, but
recently, for isntance, I thought about using a reddit like system for
the Portuguese Wikipedia village pump for the community distringuish
try to distinguish what is good or not. I mentioned something like All
Our Ideas once , but I think there are
other things worth trying, if possible.

P. S. Just look the discussion system inside a wiki. Damn.

Tom

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jessie Wild  wrote:

> Any initial thoughts on how to maximize the effectiveness of those two
> ideas (IdeaLab and Learning Portal)?


--
Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
"A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful
than a life spent doing nothing."

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l