Dear All,
Please find here [1] a link to our draft Progress Report. This report will
be further reviewed for language, metrics, and other visualisation before
submission. We would like to thank you for the support during the drafting
of this report.
Do let us know if there is anything else,
[1]
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> > Hoi,
> >
> > Sorry Fred, I do not like your post. The quote has it wrong because
> > research shows that it is factually wrong. Wikipedia has a better
> > coverage
> > at a superior quality to the encyclopaedia that went before. The only
> >
> On 26 July 2013 12:48, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
>> "As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
>> lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
>> Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands of the people
>> experimenting with the new tools, rathe
On 26 July 2013 12:48, Fred Bauder wrote:
> "As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
> lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
> Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands of the people
> experimenting with the new tools, rather than
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> If systemic biased editing is not considered your statement would be
> true. However, one of the side effects of our volunteeristic methods is
> that systemic bias resulting from editing by groups and interests with
> numberless agendas is ine
On 26 July 2013 13:33, Martijn Hoekstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> "As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
>> lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
>> Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands
> Hoi,
>
> Sorry Fred, I do not like your post. The quote has it wrong because
> research shows that it is factually wrong. Wikipedia has a better
> coverage
> at a superior quality to the encyclopaedia that went before. The only
> thing
> I can agree with is that it is available at a much lower co
Hoi,
Sorry Fred, I do not like your post. The quote has it wrong because
research shows that it is factually wrong. Wikipedia has a better coverage
at a superior quality to the encyclopaedia that went before. The only thing
I can agree with is that it is available at a much lower cost; it is the
c
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Fred Bauder
> wrote:
>
>> "As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
>> lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
>> Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands of the people
>> experimenting with the new
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> "As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
> lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
> Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands of the people
> experimenting with the new tools, ra
"As with other inventions that produced an inferior product at a much
lower price, from the printing press to the steam-driven loom to
Wikipedia, what happens now is largely in the hands of the people
experimenting with the new tools, rather than defending themselves from
them."
http://chronicle.c
11 matches
Mail list logo
