I would like to see this become an open part of Meta. It is traditional
meta-work, and rewarding to improve and revisit regularly.
Sam.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.comwrote:
On 8/11/2012 8:05 PM, Mono wrote:
Should we lock StrategyWiki as historical?
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to see this become an open part of Meta. It is traditional
meta-work, and rewarding to improve and revisit regularly.
Sam.
I disagree. Strategy work is Wikimedia Foundation's focus planning. Meta
is
I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking
everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location
that's easy for newbies to find.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Disclaimer viewable at
On 12 August 2012 13:04, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking
everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location
that's easy for newbies to find.
Strategy Wiki has already been
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has always been the platform for the whole
movement, not only the
Thehelpfulone wrote:
Strategy Wiki has already been configured as an import source for
Meta-Wiki, so any admins on Meta (there are plenty) will be able to import
pages cross-wiki with full history via
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Import. Perhaps we could put things
into a new
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has always been the platform for the
On 12/08/2012 16:45, MZMcBride wrote:
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has
Speaking of moving strategy pages to meta...
I was recently looking for the information that is contained in these pages:
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africa
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Europe
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_and_North_Africa
