It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was "popular" to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or disadvantages of Meta. Meta has always been the platform for the whole movement, not only the wiki content websites. By the way, the WCA decided not to have a wiki of its own but to use Meta. Kind regards Ziko
2012/8/12 Thehelpfulone <thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com>: > On 12 August 2012 13:04, Richard Symonds > <richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk>wrote: > >> I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking >> everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location >> that's easy for newbies to find. >> > > Strategy Wiki has already been configured as an import source for > Meta-Wiki, so any admins on Meta (there are plenty) will be able to import > pages cross-wiki with full history via > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Import. Perhaps we could put things > into a new Strategy: namespace? > > -- > Thehelpfulone > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Thehelpfulone > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter http://wmnederland.nl/ Wikimedia Nederland Postbus 167 3500 AD Utrecht ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
