Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wimedia on line?

Hi Peter, There is currently a report of a user experiencing similar issues in our Phabricator instance at . If you could either post a tracert onto this email or into the phabricator ticket would be of great assistance. On 10 September 2016 at 15:20, P

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wimedia on line?

Could be difficult as it is now working normally (I think) Cheers, Peter -Original Message- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of K. Peachey Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2016 11:19 AM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wimedia o

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wimedia on line?

Very happy to hear it, but very strange, as everything else was connecting normally. Thanks for the response Peter -Original Message- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Gergo Tisza Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2016 8:27 AM To: Wikimedia Maili

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fixed the citation issue yet?

On 08/09/16 05:54, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > There is only one question left: Are we > ready to fix these quality issues? My observation would be that citations come in many forms, and that a agreed format does not appear to exist. Writing for a academic journal authors have to follow the style of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fixed the citation issue yet?

Hoi, That is another issue.. I do not think so. For us being able to link a statement in a text or in Wikidata is what we define as a source. For me the central question is: Are Wikipedians willing to consider quality in their own project and appreciate that as a fringe benefit for them the qualit