On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55 AM, David Cuenca Tudela
wrote:
> Hi Eileen,
>
> Thanks for the follow up and for the nice letter that you wrote to the
> Turkish Minister. There is something I do not understand about Turkey's
> block and maybe you (or somebody else) could offer
I think they can see the subdomain too (i.e. en.wikipedia.org or
tr.wikipedia.org) but yeah.
On Thu, 24 May 2018, 09:13 James Hare, wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55 AM, David Cuenca Tudela
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eileen,
> >
> > Thanks for the follow up
Hi Eileen,
Thanks for the follow up and for the nice letter that you wrote to the
Turkish Minister. There is something I do not understand about Turkey's
block and maybe you (or somebody else) could offer some insights about it.
Apparently the ban was issued because it was felt that Turkey was
Thanks for the explanation, James!
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:06 AM, James Hare wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55 AM, David Cuenca Tudela
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eileen,
> >
> > Thanks for the follow up and for the nice letter that you wrote to the
> >
I find this rather disturbing that Airtasker accepts adds for people
wanting to have articles written, on wikipedia.
The person writing the add is asking someone to violate WMF terms &
Conditions as you can some of the respondents are indicating that they do
this regularly
In what way are they proposing to violate WMF terms and conditions?
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Gnangarra
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 12:29 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Airtasker
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Gnangarra wrote:
> Would it be prudent for the WMF legal to contact Airtasker
>
You might want to ask legal directly at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal#Wikimedia_Foundation_Email_Contacts
--
Daniel Zahn
Shouldn't articles be judged independently of who exactly wrote them and
for what reason?
If an article reads well, has good content, is sourced, neutral etc, what's
the issue exactly?
On 24 May 2018 at 12:28, Gnangarra wrote:
> I find this rather disturbing that Airtasker
We have Terms of Use that require disclosure when people are involved in
paid editing. Often paid editing occurs on obscure topics and we are unable
to closely vet the volume of paid editing that is occurring, this means a
lots of promotional content can and does slip through and make us look bad.
>From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-05-24/From_the_editor
Op-ed: Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-05-24/Op-ed
Opinion: Integrating my many
Hello everyone,
The next Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting will take
place on Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 6:00 PM UTC (11 AM PDT). The IRC channel
is #wikimedia-office on https://webchat.freenode.net, and the meeting will
be broadcast as a live YouTube stream.[1] We’ll post the
11 matches
Mail list logo