Where would it fit in Strategy 2030? Advocacy?
Paulo
James Heilman escreveu no dia segunda, 20/05/2019 à(s)
05:41:
> We all agree NC licenses are poor. The WMF position was a reflection of the
> community's position at the time and this likely remains the community's
> position today.
>
> If we
The idea that NC is "open and free" is growing like a cancer in Brazil and
Portugal. I've been noticing that for some time already, and I do believe
we as a Movement should have some sort of plan or strategy to fight that -
and never indulge in accepting NC as a valid license for the Wikimedia
proj
Hi MarioGom,
Thanks for outlining these concerns. The Legal Team is currently looking into
the issue and has reached out to SurveyMonkey for additional information. I
will provide an update here when the matter is resolved.
Best,
Elena
--
Elena Lappen (she/her)
Community Relations Specialist
Do you think it might be a common misconception, perhaps?
On May 20, 2019, at 6:39 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta
wrote:
> The idea that NC is "open and free" is growing like a cancer in Brazil and
> Portugal. I've been noticing that for some time already, and I do believe
> we as a Movement sho
*Books & Bytes – Issue 33, March – April 2019*
Highlights:
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Read the full newsletter at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/March-April_2019
