[Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikimania 2023 program submission reminder and where to see the submitted entries

2023-03-18 Thread Butch Bustria
Hi All, We are starting office hour (00:00 UTC) at https://meet.google.com/fit-vxck-nmk Our next office hour is also today, 19 March (Sunday) at 14:00 UTC : https://meet.jit.si/Wikimania2023_Office_Hour -- Sincerely, Butch Bustria

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-18 Thread Steven Walling
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:49 PM Erik Moeller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:05 PM Steven Walling > wrote: > > > IANAL of course, but to me this implies that responsibility for the > *egregious* lack > > of attribution in models that rely substantially on Wikipedia is > violating the

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-18 Thread Erik Moeller
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:05 PM Steven Walling wrote: > IANAL of course, but to me this implies that responsibility for the > *egregious* lack > of attribution in models that rely substantially on Wikipedia is violating > the Attribution > requirements of CC licenses. Morally, I agree that

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-18 Thread Peter Southwood
“Cowen has sufficient credentials to be treated as a reliable expert” Maybe not for much longer. Cheers, P. From: The Cunctator [mailto:cuncta...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 March 2023 17:49 To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT This is an important development for

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-18 Thread Matej Grochal
Hi all I agree that the AI creators should attribute Wikipedia as their source. But on the other hand, when the result is incorrect etc we might actually be glad that they do not attribute it. The issue is how to convince readers to come to the source (our projects) rather than using in-between