Hi Fæ,
I've requested it's taken down using
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals so it should be updated
soon.
Thanks,
RhinosF1
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 15:20, Fæ wrote:
> Can someone explain how a vandalized version of the Wikipedia article
> about Henry Kissinger that was only
I remember hearing why this happens, and that it is a concern to Google,
but I don’t remember the technical details. They want to work with us to
fix this issue. I will reach out and get more information. Thanks for
flagging!
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 8:57 AM Dennis During wrote:
> Isn't it
I've had a few successes in the past with getting Google to remove
vandalised versions of pages from their cache/main search results using
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals?pli=1 - in this case it
appears in the knowledge panel but not the cached copy of the page, so it
might be
Isn't it statistically inevitable that some offensively vandalized version
of some WP article will happen to be the version that Google caches? I
suppose they don't refresh the cache very often. Weekly? I know Google
doesn't make it easy to complain effectively about such blunders.
On Sun, Oct 6,
Can someone explain how a vandalized version of the Wikipedia article
about Henry Kissinger that was only visible for a rather short time
several days ago, is still being promoted in Google searches
today?[1][2]
The "zombie sex" vandalism was only visible for a few minutes, quickly
fixed by admin
