[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

> > No speech interface as far as I can tell, but FYI, there now is at Emerson by Quickchat has a speech interface integration to GPT models. - https://www.quickchat.ai/emerson

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 1:00 AM Anders Wennersten wrote: > For me the only question is of Google come first (who has better knowledge > how to interface > backend knowledge repositories the Wikipedia will become) or if chatGPT will > learn this No speech interface as far as I can tell, but

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I have also played around with simpler queries (see below) and find the same: excellent, easy to read answers, with minor mistakes and sometimes false, invented info. But I still see this as the future. If/when this is implemented with speech recognition (already exists) and good synthetic

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 2:01 PM Erik Moeller wrote: > Querying Wikidata via SPARQL is currently still a bit of wizardry (and > the query builder is extremely limited). To pick a completely random > example not at all inspired by current events, if I wanted to see a > list of journalists with

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 1:04 PM Paulo Santos Perneta < paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been playing with it on over the last week, and my experience is that > that AI is incredibly prone to invent informations that look credible, > while being entirely made up by it. It would generate

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

Hi, I am not sure if the generated article text is how it will be used as long it will invent stuff from thin air. However, it is rather good for summarizing text and converting source text to a structured format. For example, converting Wikimedia Commons categories to wikidata properties.

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I've been playing with it on over the last week, and my experience is that that AI is incredibly prone to invent informations that look credible, while being entirely made up by it. It would generate inexistent persons, dates, events and places, and build an entire story out of them that,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

Hello, About my experiences with Chat CPT - is it good enough to write our articles? - I made this video: https://youtu.be/zKPEyxYt5kg Kind regards Ziko Am Di., 20. Dez. 2022 um 20:25 Uhr schrieb Pharos : > > I'd like to share my experiment with using ChapGPT to help write an article > on

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I'd like to share my experiment with using ChapGPT to help write an article on English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artwork_title You can see an explanation of the process here, your comments are welcome: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Artwork_title#Use_of_ChatGPT Thanks,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I'd be curious about copyright issues though, as it's licensed on Github . It may indeed be infringing copyright, since he may require attribution. However, I agree with The Cunctator that the community won't do anything about it.

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I think we should not underestimate what this could evolve into. We thrived because our readers find us "good enough" when it comes to finding facts, not the ultimate source. And the software learns by reading, and can (and have done so) Wikipedia, Wikidata etc and represent our data in its

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

Here is what ChatGPT has to offer on the subject of Earth's flatness: Please answer in English the question "Elaborate on the question wether the earth is flat, and give some sources." There is no scientific evidence that the earth is flat. On the contrary, there is a wealth of evidence that

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

AI simply cant descriminate between good research and faked research, for any outcome it must provide all of its sources whether they are from Wikipedia, Wikidata, WikiCommons, WikiSource or some other place. Otherwise it will answer yes to some asking if the world is flat because it'll seek out

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:55 AM Anders Wennersten wrote: > ChatGPT is now making headlines more or less every day and I perceive > them to try to position themself av the "next" google. I suspect OpenAI will continue to focus on generative applications (images, code, text for purposes such as

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

I perceive we have a good dialogue with Google, and where Google show respect and also acknowledge Wikipedia role in their fact box etc ChatGPT is now making headlines more or less every day  and I perceive them to try to position themself  av the "next" google. But what about our dialogue

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

Hello Cuncutator, I think there's several lines of thought on this. On what theory would you argue that ChatGPT is violating Wiki[p|m]edia copyright? (If you've already posted reasoning elsewhere, or if someone else has posted an opinion you happen to agree with; I'd be happy to read a link as

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

It's trained on Wikipedia. Here's a 2020 paper from the authors. I would argue it's violating the copyright but I'm aware the foundation isn't very interested in defending it. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165 On Sat, Dec 10, 2022, 10:42 AM Anders Wennersten wrote: > Is this Ai software using