much like hard work,
> their view on notability was different to ours or because they couldn't
> work out how to deal with an edit conflict. But it would be good to get an
> idea of the ratio between those main reasons, and also to find out if there
> are other significant reasons f
.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Cardy
Sent: Sunday, 26 February 2017 2:44 PM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] proposal for regular surveys of community opinion
I'm ke
significant reasons
for losing goodfaith newbies.
Regards
WereSpielChequers
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:18:47 -0700
> From: Bill Takatoshi
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] proposal for regular surveys of community
> opinion
>
An interesting idea, and if it reduces the survey load on the community
that would be good. But one should never survey for the sake of it. Any
proposed survey question should be able to meet the test "What will you do
with the answer to this question?" In my experience, the response to that
is
Over the past few weeks I have been discussing how to correct the lack
of information about community opinion and the disadvantages of
relying on opt-in (RFCs or less formal "speak up and stick your neck
out") methods for addressing the problem with Foundation staff, other
community members, and ou
