Hi Varnet,
I have emailed Affcom or individual members on more than one occasion for
an update about the Cascadia Wikimedians user group application. We
finished our response to Affcom's last question on August 7, which was
almost a month ago. We have projects that we would like to start that are
Thank you everyone for your feedback and ideas. They're already being
discussed internally by AffCom and may be reflected in our next call for
candidates. There will not be any changes to the process for this call.
Some additional information folks may find helpful...
This call will add at least
2014-09-04 17:07 GMT-03:00 Michael Peel :
> Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as
> the FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep
> applications confidential here?
>
>
That is a good idea. But that will not happen any time soon or ever.
Tom
__
Sorry, clarification: I'm alluding to Wikipedians' tendency to go off
into detailed side-discussions at the drop of a hat. I didn't mean
this as a dig at anyone.
On 4 September 2014 21:28, David Gerard wrote:
> No yak left unshaven!
>
> On 4 September 2014 21:07, Michael Peel wrote:
>> Another o
No yak left unshaven!
On 4 September 2014 21:07, Michael Peel wrote:
> Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as the
> FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep applications
> confidential here?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 4 Sep 2014, at 20:51, Ad
Just what Risker suggested. ;-) (And I'd also support.)
Cheers,
Martin
2014-09-04 22:07 GMT+02:00 Michael Peel :
> Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as
> the FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep
> applications confidential here?
>
> Th
Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as the
FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep applications
confidential here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 4 Sep 2014, at 20:51, Ad Huikeshoven wrote:
> One option to consider is establishing an OTRS queue for AffC
One option to consider is establishing an OTRS queue for AffCom.
How many vacancies are there to be filled?
Greetings,
Ad
2014-09-04 21:45 GMT+02:00 Risker :
> Committees can have more than one mailing list, Bence.
>
> I suggest that Affcom rethink its approach: there's no good reason to
> as
Committees can have more than one mailing list, Bence.
I suggest that Affcom rethink its approach: there's no good reason to
assume that the order of candidacy has anything to do with selection,
particularly if it goes to a second list, and your "nominating
subcommittee" all has access. It is alw
Thank you for the suggestion, Anne!
As some background, the reason the private e-mail address is used instead
of the AffCom mailing list is that it allows the incoming applications to
be looked at all at the same time - thus not giving anyone an advantage or
disadvantage based on the time they ap
A gmail address?
I am sure if you ask nicely the committee can be granted a wikimedia.org
email address through Mailman that will allow more than one person to
handle applications. It could probably be done pretty quickly.
Risker/Anne
On 4 September 2014 14:35, Carlos M. Colina wrote:
> Dear
11 matches
Mail list logo
