Can we get back on topic please? I isn't there another thread for beating
the fundraising-disclosure-oversight dead horse?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia
Dear Joseph
Thanks for that link.
*NB*: I hope that the list moderators shall not censor / block / unduly
delay this important internal conversation we are having concerning WMF
self-financing model.
Since this concerns the WMF fund-raising drives of Nov-Dec 2016, I'm
linking to the following me
hi david,
as with your accusations regarding the spending, my question would be whether
you have anything to substantiate it. Seddon was clear: it did not happen,
unless perhaps a human error in a minimal number of campaigns. If you have
that then please bring that up in a *separate* thead.
you'r
Hi David,
I would refer to my answer I gave on the forked thread relating to this
topic.
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2017-September/088570.html
Regards
Seddon
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:46 PM, David Emrany wrote:
> Sure Lodewijk,
>
> Banners from December 2016:
> https://c
Sure Lodewijk,
Banners from December 2016:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inline_donor_bannerbass.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Inline_donor_bannerbass.png
Comments from Seddon
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-December/085612.html
Perhaps
On 2 September 2017 at 02:09, Michael Peel wrote:
> This is possibly the most annoying feature of the Wikimedia projects at the
> moment. You access a page. Then you start reading or editing it. And then
> suddenly the page jumps when a fundraising banner / central notice /
> gadget / beta featur
Hi David,
Would you mind elaborating on the first point? I vaguely recall test
banners being shown to logged in users, but don't recall seeing one myself
while logged in for a while.
Best,
Lodewijk
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:16 PM, David Emrany wrote:
> a) This is incorrect
> b) how many years w
a) This is incorrect
b) how many years would "for several years" encompass?
David
On 9/5/17, Joseph Seddon wrote:
> WMF hasn't shown fundraising banners to logged in users for several years.
>
> Regards
> Seddon
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guideline
WMF hasn't shown fundraising banners to logged in users for several years.
Regards
Seddon
On 5 Sep 2017 08:33, "Lodewijk" wrote:
> Hey Ori,
>
> I like the creative thinking :) For the fundraising that could indeed work
> well (although I have no numbers on what percentage of domations comes f
yeah, there's lots of relevant banners for editors I don't mind seeing.
On 5 September 2017 at 08:32, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hey Ori,
>
> I like the creative thinking :) For the fundraising that could indeed work
> well (although I have no numbers on what percentage of domations comes from
> logged in
Hey Ori,
I like the creative thinking :) For the fundraising that could indeed work
well (although I have no numbers on what percentage of domations comes from
logged in users etc), but there are also campaigns tht are quite relevant
for logged in users.
Lodewijk
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:16 PM,
On Sep 3, 2017 13:02, "David Gerard" wrote:
On 2 September 2017 at 02:09, Michael Peel wrote:
> This is possibly the most annoying feature of the Wikimedia projects at
the moment. You access a page. Then you start reading or editing it. And
then suddenly the page jumps when a fundraising banner
There are 4 or more different problems being discussed here, and it
would be helpful to be precise about each of them, and keep them
separate because they are technically distinct, despite being
thematically linked. (Note: I'm not a dev, which both helps me
simplify the explanation, but also means
Just noting in passing that ascribing this to the gadgets that make up a
personal profile...isn't always what is the problem. I don't think
standard non-logged-in profile has any of these finicky bits, yet the same
thing happens to users who are not logged in. All the time - half the time
I find
These issues can be fixed. Have the banners load below the buttons we
typically click on. Move the gadgets to the left of "read" rather than to
the right of "view history". I have proposed this for TW as I mentioned here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#Button_load_issues
J
O
On 2 September 2017 at 02:09, Michael Peel wrote:
> This is possibly the most annoying feature of the Wikimedia projects at the
> moment. You access a page. Then you start reading or editing it. And then
> suddenly the page jumps when a fundraising banner / central notice / gadget /
> beta fea
6:44 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?
Can't we render each gadget in a Foundation-controlled with a height
taller than the gadget ever typically flows to?
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Krinkle wrote:
>
Can't we render each gadget in a Foundation-controlled with a
height taller than the gadget ever typically flows to?
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Krinkle wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Unexpected page jumps are never fun. They tend to be known as a "reflow" or
> FOUC [1], and are common all over th
Hi Mike,
Unexpected page jumps are never fun. They tend to be known as a "reflow" or
FOUC [1], and are common all over the web at different times.
Unfortunately, while there may be multiple gadgets / features exhibiting
this undesired behaviour, it is not a general problem or limitation. As
such,
I just put forwards a proposal to fix part of this issue Mike :-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#Button_load_issues
The TW button is easy to fix at least I am told, once I get consensus. Amir
fixed one of the buttons earlier today.
James
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Mic
20 matches
Mail list logo
