First of all, I also think that we cannot expect us to fulfill our mission
by having all the world visiting our sites. A good percentage of that
mission probably needs to be fulfilled elsewhere thanks to our free
licenses and APIs.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Magnus Manske wrote:
> We pref
Hoi,
In my blogpost, Mr Anthony is linked to Reasonator [1]. With all due
respect, it provides better information than Wikidata does [2]. So when you
want to talk about quality, fine. This is where Wikidata will make the most
difference. It will also help you see that Mr Anthony is linked to a
publ
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/01/wikidata-william-anthony-phd.html
That blog post doesnt appear link to the Wikidata item.
It is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21745493
which only has 14 facts, but only one reference.
I
; -Original Message-
> From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2016 10:39 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] How to disseminate free knowledge? Was:
> Profile of Ma
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2016 10:39 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] How to disseminate free knowledge? Was: Profile
> of Magnus Manske
>
> Hoi,
> You d
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:45 PM Jens Best wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> thanks for bringing yourself into the discussion.
>
> I agree on several aspects you point out in the first half of your mail
> about improvements, expectations and "prominent subgroups".
>
> When it comes to re-emphasize this "ca
] How to disseminate free knowledge? Was: Profile of
Magnus Manske
Hoi,
You do not offend but worse you do not convince because your arguments fail.
What we have always done is "share in the sum of all knowledge" and to you that
is wrong. You use gobbledygook like "techbubble" an
Hoi,
You do not offend but worse you do not convince because your arguments
fail. What we have always done is "share in the sum of all knowledge" and
to you that is wrong. You use gobbledygook like "techbubble" and your
vision is one of community. Fine. You do not define community in any other
way
