I'll weigh in on wiki later today or tomorrow (I've been very sick and
haven't been on much) but I did want to put in a couple of my thoughts:
- Part of me doesn't have an enormous issue with merging content into
meta if people really want it though I don't think it helps much
- I think
(e)
I don't see any reason for changes...
On 13 August 2012 22:18, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'll weigh in on wiki later today or tomorrow (I've been very sick and
haven't been on much) but I did want to put in a couple of my thoughts:
- Part of me doesn't have an
I would like to see this become an open part of Meta. It is traditional
meta-work, and rewarding to improve and revisit regularly.
Sam.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.comwrote:
On 8/11/2012 8:05 PM, Mono wrote:
Should we lock StrategyWiki as historical?
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to see this become an open part of Meta. It is traditional
meta-work, and rewarding to improve and revisit regularly.
Sam.
I disagree. Strategy work is Wikimedia Foundation's focus planning. Meta
is
I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking
everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location
that's easy for newbies to find.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Disclaimer viewable at
On 12 August 2012 13:04, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking
everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location
that's easy for newbies to find.
Strategy Wiki has already been
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has always been the platform for the whole
movement, not only the
Thehelpfulone wrote:
Strategy Wiki has already been configured as an import source for
Meta-Wiki, so any admins on Meta (there are plenty) will be able to import
pages cross-wiki with full history via
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Import. Perhaps we could put things
into a new
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has always been the platform for the
On 12/08/2012 16:45, MZMcBride wrote:
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
It seems to me that there was a period in the WMF history when it was
popular to install new wikis, for strategy or outreach, instead of
using Meta. I don't see the advantages of having seperate wikis, or
disadvantages of Meta. Meta has
On 8/11/2012 8:05 PM, Mono wrote:
Should we lock StrategyWiki as historical?
Some options:
A) Prevent all editing and keep content at current address.
B) Restrict editing to admins and keep content at current address.
C) Move content to Meta and mark as historical, lock editing.
D) Move
11 matches
Mail list logo
