Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

I think that is a tad inappropriate, when it's been pointed out it's most likely a bug in gmail causing it. You can always create a filter in your email client of choosing if you don't want to see what, the two(?) threads that are active atm. On 4 December 2015 at 19:55, Richard Ames

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

I won't speak for him, but I think Richard was venting more than making a serious threat. Assuming this is indeed unintentional, nobody has anything to worry about. Austin On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:12 AM, K. Peachey wrote: > I think that is a tad inappropriate, when it's

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

If a respondent changes the subject, It splits the thread off to yet another thread (for those in a threaded client) which in my personal view is even more disruptive. Each to their own I guess. On 4 December 2015 at 21:32, Richard Ames wrote: > I was venting and I had had

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

I was venting and I had had a drink or two. I think any reasonable correspondent can change the subject line. So I was sort of serious, Richard. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Austin Hair wrote: > I won't speak for him, but I think Richard was venting more than > making a

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

On Friday, 4 December 2015, Chris Keating wrote: > Possibly now is the time to draw a line under this conversation, Perhaps it should be called a "subject line"? :-) ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:50 AM, K. Peachey wrote: > Each to their own I guess. Yes, until people start getting put on moderation (even if the cause is the list admin being under the influence .. unless that was also a joke). Regardless, if we dislike it to that

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Sick of the subject "(no subject)"

Possibly now is the time to draw a line under this conversation, as nothing productive is likely to come of it. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Rjd0060 wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:50 AM, K. Peachey wrote: > > > Each to their own I guess. > > >