Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikiobject - Project Proposal

2016-10-29 Thread Quico Prol
Hi , step by step advances in WikiObject project proposal:

   - Added new examples for better scope understanding:
   - Components of a 3D Printer (Prusa I3 Hephestos)
  
  - Arduino/Genuino Uno Rev 3 Datasheet
  
  - List of arduino official boards
  

(using
  Wikidata Query Service)

  - Added list of useful wikidata properties
   https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Objects

   - Initial conversations with FreeCAD
    to
   link their repositories  to
   wikidata items though "open source repository" property like here
   https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?q=Q25026145

criticism, doubts, ideas, suggestions, etc.. are very welcome

more info: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiObject

greetings

El lun., 27 jun. 2016 a las 12:15, Quico Prol ()
escribió:

> Hi, how about a wikipedia about objects?
>
> Instead of generic articles of , for example, "Ballpoint pen" or  "Bic
> cristal" it would be "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014"
>
> Doing these for millions of objects would allow people to have an open,
> free, universal and central place to refer specific objects.
>
> *Some possible applications:*
>
>
>- Creating neutral and standard lists:
>
>Nowadays if anyone create, for example, a tutorial for building
>something (DIY projects, receipts, ...) they have to link all items to a
>comercial or no-neutral web which could change its url in the future or
>redirect it to adds or whatever.
>
>Lists could be created in external webpages linking wikimedia objects
>webpage or/and could be created as category pages in Wikipedia. For
>example, currently, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_of_the_Year
>article lists cars which won COTY award but not links to the specific car
>(AUDI A3 Hatchback 2012 - Present) but generic serie (Audi A3).
>
>The good thing at this point it's that to start creating object
>lists only item name is necessary, no infoboxes or description needed.
>
>
>- Universal repository for inventories:
>
>Lot of business fill their inventories again and again with same data
>("cardboard box 50x30x15", "step by step nema motor 17", ... ) they should
>be able to import  this data from a open website with their corresponding
>info like   GTIN , SKU , Barcode... and more in the future  weight, size,
>...
>
> - Encourage Recycling and Reutilitation:
>
>Imagine if we use wikidata properties  (
>https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/Generic) like
>"has part" and "part of" , people will find other uses for objects, or
>discover were to find
>
>- Social activism and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
>
>Companies have info and metrics about their costumers (habits,
>location, ...) why not costumers have info about companies products, who
>manufacture what?, what products have a good carbon footprint
>?, what products have
>been retired from some problem?, what are Fair Trade?. This also can moved
>companies do better.
>
>
> *Very rough roadmap*:
>
>
>1. At the very begining, using wikidata infrestructure, objects would
>only have common info like "name", " image", "related  links"
>(datasheets?), GTIN.
>
>First use cases could be doing lists or grouping objects by categories.
>
>2. Step by step new fields could be added like "manufacturer" ,
>"tags", ...
>
>3. A separated website could be created. wikiobject.org isn't
>availiabe so url could be something like objects.wikpedia.org
>
>4. In a long-term in order to explote all the possibilities of this
>project more complex fields and relations would have to 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikiobject - Project Proposal

2016-07-27 Thread Quico Prol
Hi,

I have moved and add WikiObject project information to
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiObject

greetings

El jue., 30 jun. 2016 a las 7:29,  escribió:

> The wikidata mailing list or wiki would be good venues to continue the
> discussion.
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:54 Quico Prol,  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I talked with open source hardware community members and also see a great
> > potencial in this. One of them is working in a Open Source prototyping
> > board (https://github.com/FPGAwars/icezum).
> >
> > I created two example wikidata items releated with it: the open source
> > prototype board itself (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25026145) and one
> > of
> > its components, a SMD resistance (
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25030181
> > ).
> >
> > IMHO Wikidata is the best host for this idea. Also It already have
> > propierties like "connector (P2935)" , "power consumed (P2791)", "source
> > code repository (P1324)", "sponsor (P859)", "manufacturer (P176)", these
> > two last ones could may companies contributors and proclive too appear
> here
> > and to opensource data.
> >
> > I see a lot possibilities, problems , solutions , etc, but i don't nknow
> if
> > this is the place to expand the conversation,
> >
> > greetings
> >
> > 2016-06-27 12:15 GMT+02:00 Quico Prol :
> >
> > > Hi, how about a wikipedia about objects?
> > >
> > > Instead of generic articles of , for example, "Ballpoint pen" or  "Bic
> > > cristal" it would be "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014"
> > >
> > > Doing these for millions of objects would allow people to have an open,
> > > free, universal and central place to refer specific objects.
> > >
> > > *Some possible applications:*
> > >
> > >
> > >- Creating neutral and standard lists:
> > >
> > >Nowadays if anyone create, for example, a tutorial for building
> > >something (DIY projects, receipts, ...) they have to link all items
> > to a
> > >comercial or no-neutral web which could change its url in the future
> > or
> > >redirect it to adds or whatever.
> > >
> > >Lists could be created in external webpages linking wikimedia
> objects
> > >webpage or/and could be created as category pages in Wikipedia. For
> > >example, currently, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_of_the_Year
> > >article lists cars which won COTY award but not links to the
> specific
> > car
> > >(AUDI A3 Hatchback 2012 - Present) but generic serie (Audi A3).
> > >
> > >The good thing at this point it's that to start creating object
> > >lists only item name is necessary, no infoboxes or description
> needed.
> > >
> > >
> > >- Universal repository for inventories:
> > >
> > >Lot of business fill their inventories again and again with same
> data
> > >("cardboard box 50x30x15", "step by step nema motor 17", ... ) they
> > should
> > >be able to import  this data from a open website with their
> > corresponding
> > >info like   GTIN , SKU , Barcode... and more in the future  weight,
> > size,
> > >...
> > >
> > > - Encourage Recycling and Reutilitation:
> > >
> > >Imagine if we use wikidata properties  (
> > >https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/Generic)
> like
> > >"has part" and "part of" , people will find other uses for objects,
> or
> > >discover were to find
> > >
> > >- Social activism and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
> > >
> > >Companies have info and metrics about their costumers (habits,
> > >location, ...) why not costumers have info about companies products,
> > who
> > >manufacture what?, what products have a good carbon footprint
> > >?, what products
> have
> > >been retired from some problem?, what are Fair Trade?. This also can
> > moved
> > >companies do better.
> > >
> > >
> > > *Very rough roadmap*:
> > >
> > >
> > >1. At the very begining, using wikidata infrestructure, objects
> would
> > >only have common info like "name", " image", "related  links"
> > >(datasheets?), GTIN.
> > >
> > >First use cases could be doing lists or grouping objects by
> > categories.
> > >
> > >2. Step by step new fields could be added like "manufacturer" ,
> > >"tags", ...
> > >
> > >3. A separated website could be created. wikiobject.org isn't
> > >availiabe so url could be something like objects.wikpedia.org
> > >
> > >4. In a long-term in order to explote all the possibilities of this
> > >project more complex fields and relations would have to be managed,
> > like
> > > for example "fridges with energy class A+++ and width less than 80
> > cm",
> > >which could be easy if all always were similar but nothing further
> > from
> > >reality
> > >
> > >A friend of mine and me tried to build a demo version in an
> home-made
> > >apache cassandra cluster four years ago, but we don't have enough
> >