Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Thanks for taking the lead on this, Isarra, and thanks all the candidates for applying — I wish we had more than one slot to send people on! I’ve voted at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group/wmcon-2017/candidates — if anybody else has an opinion on this, please m

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Okay, Neil and Abhay put in some excellent responses, nobody else bit, so now we need to pick one of them. We can argue about it here, or vote on the page. I recommend voting on the page since that way it'll be easier for anyone to just say one or the other or both if they want to, but it depen

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

> On 3 Jan 2017, at 6:24 PM, Spencer Williams IV > wrote: > > Of the best-suited to represent Colorado Wikimedians, it may very well indeed > be the most fierce of competitions between Neal and Gaurav, as Neal has > obviously made significant contributions to Wikipedia's infrastructure while

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Neal put up a page, so anyone who's interested in doing this, please add a blurb so we can argue about it. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group/wmcon-2017/candidates As Neal said, involvement, goals, and plans. A quick note or link or whatever reminding everyone w

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

On 1/3/17 12:27 PM, Todd Allen wrote: Sounds alright to me. I'd love to go to Berlin, but really can't spare any time to travel right now. Todd On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Neal McBurnett > wrote: I suggest that after the posts go up, anyone who wants to

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Sounds alright to me. I'd love to go to Berlin, but really can't spare any time to travel right now. Todd On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Neal McBurnett wrote: > I suggest that after the posts go up, anyone who wants to can evaluate > them and then we can all vote. > Or something like that. > >

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

I suggest that after the posts go up, anyone who wants to can evaluate them and then we can all vote. Or something like that. -Neal On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 04:54:31PM -0500, Gaurav Vaidya wrote: > > > On 1 Jan 2017, at 11:05 AM, Neal McBurnett wrote: > > > > Yes - I'm interested! I was going

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

> On 1 Jan 2017, at 11:05 AM, Neal McBurnett wrote: > > Yes - I'm interested! I was going to go to the Wikimedia Developer Summit in > San Francisco this month to continue to get more involved with the AI and > machine learning work, but election-integrity-related stuff has poured over > int

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Yes - I'm interested! I was going to go to the Wikimedia Developer Summit in San Francisco this month to continue to get more involved with the AI and machine learning work, but election-integrity-related stuff has poured over into the new year, so I can't swing that. https://www.mediawiki.or

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Okay, yay, two candidates! Any more any more? Also, any ideas on how we could pick one? Would anybody be interested in a vote? We could run that at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group — otherwise, once all the applicants are in, we could just pick one at random at

Re: [Wikimedia-US-CO] Wikimedia-US-CO Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

Representation in such events will raise our profile and help grow membership. I can also do this but will defer to another candidate if needed. Cheers, Abhay On Dec 31, 2016 6:00 AM, wrote: Send Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list submissions to wikimedia-us-co@lists.wikimedia.org To subsc