The duration of copyright in photographs was significantly extended as a
result of implementing Australia's
obligations under the AUSFTA. This made protection for photographs
consistent with protection for other types of
artistic works. For photographs in which copyrights still subsisted on 1
G'day all,
I just thought I'd ask the committee (and anyone else) if they've heard
anything about possible attendance at an 'all chapters' meeting in Berlin in
April... in particular if fund-raising is being considered, or maybe just to
check that we're 'on the radar' down here :-)
cheers.
coolio! - I'd missed the detail in the minutes (sorry);
http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Meeting:Committee_(2009_January_15)
- is there any call for a bit of AU fundraising at this stage? - the minutes
indicate we've requested subsidy, and presumably the WMF and the German
Chapter are kicking in
we've said that we're requesting a spot for the Prez, and that in the event
that there is funding and all the stars align then we'd like to send the
Vice Prez too. There is discussion about whether 1 or 2 people from the
various chapters will be going but I think it unlikely given the costs -
Under the FTA copyright in the US is extinguished if the copyright in the
originating country was already extinguished at the time of FTA being
implimented
2009/2/11 Stephen Bain stephen.b...@gmail.com
2009/2/10 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com:
According to the reading by the Copyright
Rather negative Wikipedia story in The Australian higher education
supplement (page 1, also here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.htm
l).
Kim
Kimberlee Weatherall
Senior Lecturer
TC Beirne School of Law
The University of Queensland
St Lucia,
I think that if people read the article (and haven't already made up their
mind) then they will notice the pundit has already made up his mind before
he did the interview...
2009/2/11 Kimberlee Weatherall k.weather...@law.uq.edu.au
Rather negative Wikipedia story in *The Australian *higher
Is the Sunday Times, of the Times of UK?
One of their journos bludged his Keith Miller blog post off my article about
Miller.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:10 PM, YellowMonkey blnguyen2...@gmail.comwrote:
I think that if people read the article (and haven't already made up their
mind) then they
2009/2/11 Kimberlee Weatherall k.weather...@law.uq.edu.au:
Rather negative Wikipedia story in The Australian higher education
supplement (page 1, also here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.html).
At least they edited out the glaring error in the original
