I have few queries on license of a recording of a public talk.
In YouTube, there are many videos of tamil public talks available. They are
on literature, history, politics and more.
Though the uploaded did not choose the license, who owns the copyright?
The speaker
The Video recorder
The event
Photo of a public figure (person) clicked during a public function or at any
public place/event (like rally, speech,..) can be uploaded to commons under CC
licence. Can the same logic be applied here?
Regards,
Pavanaja
From: Wikimediaindia-l On Behalf
Of Shrinivasan T
Sent: Friday,
I think the question Shrini is asking is different. A public talk (not a
musical or other such performance) is still copyrighted if the uploader has
uploaded it as a copyrighted work. In general, the tak is always owned by the
original author i.e. the speaker but the uploader only owns the
Wikimedia India is an Indian organization, and the Wikimedia Foundation
does not have a say in its internal governance. It does, of course, have
great *influence*, insofar as it is historically its biggest funder, and in
that it can revoke its recognition as a Wikimedia affiliate. I state this
Thank You Asaf Bartov for writing back!
On Fri 14 Sep, 2018, 3:33 PM Asaf Bartov, wrote:
> Wikimedia India is an Indian organization, and the Wikimedia Foundation
> does not have a say in its internal governance. It does, of course, have
> great *influence*, insofar as it is historically its
Dear All,
I'm a newbie user.
On Wiki Mania Travel Issue:
I fear, what can get solved with a Hangout/IRC is draining us all for more
than a month.
We're washing dirty linen over community list, assuming
1. each person who receives it, is reading the same with interest
Purely in the
