Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] The Hindu : The struggles of keeping Kannada Wikipedia afloat

2012-02-22 Thread Shiju Alex
I think there are 3 issues that this newsarticle raises.

The first is the is the desperate urgency for community building.
 Community building is a combination of:

   - increased community communication (in increasing order of importance:
   events, mailing lists, talk pages, meet-ups and village pumps)
   - stronger community collaboration (small wikiprojects starting of with
   even 2 editors and on virtually any topic of interest whether it is a
   subject area like health articles or a task like translate articles
   clean-up)
   - more frequent and impactful outreach (including targeting the most
   suitable audience profile for outreach, combination of classroom  hands-on
   editing experience during the workshop, staying in touch with newbies after
   the session, hand-holding newbies during their first 100 edits and
   integrating newbies into the existing community)
   - reaching out retired editors - which is a particularly severe problem
   in Kannada (and Telugu) because active editor numbers have declined (or not
   grown) over the past 1 year.  This is particularly alarming given the small
   community size.  Also, the reason why these editors retired is not because
   of technology but a whole host of other reasons (including changing
   personal circumstances, lack of an adequate sense of community, lack of
   collabaration inside wiki, lack of pride of projects, over usage of bots,
   and so on.

The second is that while there are very real issues that the Google
translate project created (some of which were outlined below), the biggest
problem is that it focuses on content and not community.  This is a similar
problem to using bots to create content - which has been shown time and
time again to downright harmful to projects and hence to communities.  On
the specific issue of Google translate project, it also represents a solid
opportunity to get existing editors (and maybe some newbies as well) to get
involved with the clean up.  Some editors in Kannada wikipedia have already
started preparatory work on this - and there is great potential in this.
 It is a great way of building the community through collaboration around a
common mission.

The third issue is on technology.  I know that - historically for PCs -
there have been issues around fonts, browsers, OS, and so on.  However, I
think these are becoming less critical as technical developments have
resolved many issues.  (This is evidenced by the increased Kannada presence
in the blogosphere as well as on sites like facebook and twitter.)  Having
said that, editing wikipedia - in any language - does require certain basic
technical comfort especially when one clicks on edit and sees the HTML
mark-ups that pop up.  To that extent, I would suggest that we don't focus
too much on the technical challenges but place all our emphasis on
community building.  According to me technical challenge is not a major
issue for most of the major indic languages (when it come to PCs). And now
it is time for us to come out this excuse and contribute to our own
language wikipedia.

Omshivaprakash is right when he says that too few knew that they can edit.
 To address this, a combination of outreach and press coverage is essential
to convey this message.  On press coverage, it is tempting to put out
stories that a particular language has achieved a milestone (for example,
10,000 article milestone.) is great but the even more useful ones are
stories that mention that anyone can edit, give the very basics of editing,
suggest specific areas where readers might be interested and give them
contact details in case they are interested.

In all this, do keep in mind that readership of Indic language wikipedias
is growing exponentially. The audience is there now!  We need to get the
community built so that the can edit the content.

Thanks
Shiju







On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ashwin Baindur
ashwin.bain...@gmail.comwrote:


 As a person working in the relevant field, we would welcome Shiju's
 comments on the article, its facts, proposed steps by the editors mentioned
 and what Kannada Wikipedia needs for revival.

 Warm regards,

 Ashwin Baindur
 --



 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tinu Cherian (Wikimedia India) 
 tinucher...@wikimedia.in wrote:

  *The Hindu : The struggles of keeping Kannada Wikipedia afloat*

 http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/article2909005.ece

 *In the world of online Kannada content, blogs may be thriving but
 Wikipedia is struggling. The reasons vary from technology barriers to lack
 of contributors, say Wikipedians.

 While there has been a surge in Kannada content in the last two years,
 contributors to the language have been grappling with technology barriers.

 After floundering for years, the Kannada Wikipedia picked up with font
 availability, said Hari Prasad Nadig, a Kannada Wikipedian. The software
 to add to Kannada Wikipedia is not so 

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] The Hindu : The struggles of keeping Kannada Wikipedia afloat

2012-02-22 Thread Abhiram C
As a small editor on kn-wp, I find that the people using the kn-wp lack
basic rules of editing wikipedia since I often see that :-

   - Only the same editors edit there. Newbies are a lot less.
   - The newbies are in a large number - IP addresses only and they never
   want to create their own account
   - The kn-wikipedia is sometimes used  for advertisement of people ( say
   for ex: I need money urgently for operation etc., OR for schools where they
   start the article with their school name say this school is the best school
   in that particular town)
   - The other thing  is that some of the editors who have created
   accounts, upload pics they have taken on kn-wikipedia itself without any
   rights posted.
   - Also the editors or IP addresses who edit never observe messages sent
   to them. I was tired of informing people the rightful duties of an editor
   and left that job.

Eventhough I edit a lot on sa-wp and sa-ws... My native language is
Kannada., I felt about the state of kn-wp seeing all those articles on
newspapers. I only want kn-wp community to take help from people who edit
wikipedia (maye in any other language) also. The administrators and b'cats
of kn-wp have all slept off or retired or busy (with their own work)
after the initial hard work. I saw HPN sir on IRC (#wikimedia-in) and
talked to him but their was no response at all WAKE UP FROM SLUMBER
KANNADA ADMINISTRATORS  B'CATS.. This is a very kind request from a
kind kannadiga..
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Shiju Alex sh...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 I think there are 3 issues that this newsarticle raises.

 The first is the is the desperate urgency for community building.
  Community building is a combination of:

- increased community communication (in increasing order of
importance: events, mailing lists, talk pages, meet-ups and village pumps)
- stronger community collaboration (small wikiprojects starting of
with even 2 editors and on virtually any topic of interest whether it is a
subject area like health articles or a task like translate articles
clean-up)
- more frequent and impactful outreach (including targeting the most
suitable audience profile for outreach, combination of classroom  hands-on
editing experience during the workshop, staying in touch with newbies after
the session, hand-holding newbies during their first 100 edits and
integrating newbies into the existing community)
- reaching out retired editors - which is a particularly severe
problem in Kannada (and Telugu) because active editor numbers have declined
(or not grown) over the past 1 year.  This is particularly alarming given
the small community size.  Also, the reason why these editors retired is
not because of technology but a whole host of other reasons (including
changing personal circumstances, lack of an adequate sense of community,
lack of collabaration inside wiki, lack of pride of projects, over usage of
bots, and so on.

 The second is that while there are very real issues that the Google
 translate project created (some of which were outlined below), the biggest
 problem is that it focuses on content and not community.  This is a similar
 problem to using bots to create content - which has been shown time and
 time again to downright harmful to projects and hence to communities.  On
 the specific issue of Google translate project, it also represents a solid
 opportunity to get existing editors (and maybe some newbies as well) to get
 involved with the clean up.  Some editors in Kannada wikipedia have already
 started preparatory work on this - and there is great potential in this.
  It is a great way of building the community through collaboration around a
 common mission.

 The third issue is on technology.  I know that - historically for PCs -
 there have been issues around fonts, browsers, OS, and so on.  However, I
 think these are becoming less critical as technical developments have
 resolved many issues.  (This is evidenced by the increased Kannada presence
 in the blogosphere as well as on sites like facebook and twitter.)  Having
 said that, editing wikipedia - in any language - does require certain basic
 technical comfort especially when one clicks on edit and sees the HTML
 mark-ups that pop up.  To that extent, I would suggest that we don't focus
 too much on the technical challenges but place all our emphasis on
 community building.  According to me technical challenge is not a major
 issue for most of the major indic languages (when it come to PCs). And now
 it is time for us to come out this excuse and contribute to our own
 language wikipedia.

 Omshivaprakash is right when he says that too few knew that they can edit.
  To address this, a combination of outreach and press coverage is essential
 to convey this message.  On press coverage, it is tempting to put out
 stories that a particular language has achieved a milestone (for 

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] The Hindu : The struggles of keeping Kannada Wikipedia afloat

2012-02-19 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
1. There should be more articles like this in non-English newspapers.
I found a few in the http://wiki.wikimedia.in/In_the_news page, but
there should be much more.

2. Here's one thing that can make the Kannada Wikipedia popular: It
should have more content that would be useful for children preparing
their homework in Kannada-medium schools. That is true for any other
language, too. I know a few teachers in Israel who are not really
Wikipedians - they don't participate in talk page discussions, they
don't consider themselves part of the community, they don't come to
meetups and they don't necessarily have accounts, but they improve
articles in Hebrew about the subject that they teach at the time. The
growth of Wikipedia is not important to them per se; they simply know
that the students will search for homework online whether they like it
or not and will probably find Wikipedia, so they want to make sure
that the students will receive the right information.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬



2012/2/20 Ashwin Baindur ashwin.bain...@gmail.com:

 As a person working in the relevant field, we would welcome Shiju's comments
 on the article, its facts, proposed steps by the editors mentioned and what
 Kannada Wikipedia needs for revival.

 Warm regards,

 Ashwin Baindur
 --



 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tinu Cherian (Wikimedia India)
 tinucher...@wikimedia.in wrote:

 The Hindu : The struggles of keeping Kannada Wikipedia afloat

 http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/article2909005.ece

 In the world of online Kannada content, blogs may be thriving but
 Wikipedia is struggling. The reasons vary from technology barriers to lack
 of contributors, say Wikipedians.

 While there has been a surge in Kannada content in the last two years,
 contributors to the language have been grappling with technology barriers.

 After floundering for years, the Kannada Wikipedia picked up with font
 availability, said Hari Prasad Nadig, a Kannada Wikipedian. The software to
 add to Kannada Wikipedia is not so user-friendly, and only geeks can edit it
 properly.

 Unlike English, which has a large community, technology issues are glaring
 in smaller communities. “Growth is slow with respect to technology in
 smaller communities,” he said. The lack of a good Unicode font has been a
 persisting problem so the reader ends up seeing boxes instead of Kannada
 text. After trying to write using the ‘Thunga' font, which had problems with
 vowels, besides other bugs, today, ‘Kedage' is the most complete font,
 though issues remain with this one too, Mr. Nadig said.

 Besides, various operating systems provide different levels of support for
 the script. “All these small factors together discouraged people from
 contributing. It's not that people don't want to use Kannada on the Net.
 Traffic on the Net is very high; there is Kannada on Facebook and Twitter
 too,” he said.

 Another challenge is writing and adding quality content. “The community
 has to grow if Kannada Wikipedia is to grow,” he said. The quality of
 content also matters. One person adding thousands of ‘stubs' on, say,
 Kannada films, does not help the reader, and in fact, drives them away from
 the site. Also, Kannada Wikipedia needs “starter” articles, to get people
 reading before they can start adding content, he said.

 In order to grow, Kannada Wikipedia requires an active, organic community,
 which is not imposed through a catalyst of paid content creators. Once,
 Google started a tool that had machine-translated content improved by manual
 translations. Yet the Kannada content was “looking like spam. They (manual
 translators) didn't understand markup, templates; (it was) all malformed”,
 he said.

 An observation about contributors is that people in metros prefer writing
 to the English Wikipedia though they know Kannada and are tech-savvy.
 “Bangalore has less than 10 people writing to Kannada Wikipedia,” he said.

 Omshivaprakash, Chair for Kannada Special Interest Group for Wikipedia,
 said people are not aware that Kannada Wikipedia now has simple tools to add
 content. He said “Wiki academies” would be set up to train people on adding
 Kannada content. “Everyone complains that the quality of Kannada Wikipedia
 is low, but they do not know that they can edit it themselves,” he said.

 Regards
 Tinu Cherian
 pr...@wikimedia.in
 http://wiki.wikimedia.in/In_the_news

 Important Note : Non-commercial reproduction for informative purposes
 only. The publisher ( The Hindu ) of the above news article owns the
 copyrights of the article / content. All copyrights are duly acknowledged.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Wikimedia
 Chapter, India Member's Group.
 To post to this group, send email to wmin-memb...@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe