Hi Jayantilal,
Thanks for your mail and for your concern.
First of all, I am not over-confident. I know about my own limitations very
well. But, also I have complete trust in the organizing team, in which I am
also part of. The team is working very hard to get every job done within
schedule.
Greetings Jayantilal,
It is good that Shrini is taking suggestions, and as far as I can see,
Bodhi's comment is also a suggestion on what he thinks, but no pushing.
Everybody has a "first time" to do things. However, I am sure that Bodhi,
along with other Wikimedians, has enough experience and
I have processed around 350 photos and added to a flickr album
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tshrinivasan/albums/72157699459704301
Will add remaining on around 10-15 days.
Hope we can move to commons from flickr.
There may be few duplicates.
Will do more filtering before sending to commons.
I think the pictures wont be repetitive as Shrinivasan mentioned he took
pictures of all the small statues and designs. So this looks like a real
detailed documentation of the temple. Hats off to Shrinivasan.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:14 PM Abhinav srivastava
wrote:
> I mean the pictures are
Terrific job Shrinivasan! Kudos to you. As you have mentioned that you
have taken photos of all the small statues and designs, I think it will be
a valuable asset for Commons and other projects. I would suggest you to
upload as part of WLM and also keep them in a separate additional category
of
Hello Shrini,
Thanks for positive reply. Glad you considered our suggestion.
And good luck with the competition.
@Bodhisattwa - It’s good that you’ll be able to manage. Even we have
managed it in the previous WLMs, the concern was effective use of
resources. You’ve 1 month for the competition,
Thanks all for the great comments.
I shoot those pics few months ago.
Filtering and improving them itself a huge task and demanding more
time and effort.
I was postponing that task due to various reasons.
WLM announcement gave me some encouragement to work on this.
Thats why asked this
Dear Shrini,
Greetings. I still remember your earlier contributions for WLM. They were
fantastic.
Great that you had enough time to click every statue and really I'm sync
with Subha for a barnstar.
Regarding uploading them for WLM, i see WLM more as a competition among
Wikimedians rather than
I mean the pictures are not repetitive with a very minute angle difference.
I cannot comment precisely here without having a look at the images. It was
a generic suggestions. Thanks for acknowledging.
On Wed 5 Sep, 2018, 9:33 PM Bodhisattwa Mandal,
wrote:
> Hi Abhinav and Kiran,
>
> I hope
Hi Abhinav and Kiran,
I hope we can manage this year.
Also Abhinav, of course it adds value. I come from a community which has
been working for documentary photography of heritage for a long time and we
understand the value of such photographs a lot.
Thanks for the concern though,
Bodhisattwa
I completely agree with Kiran.
I have been sorting images in the previous two WLM. It is not only tedious
it does not add much value.
On Wed 5 Sep, 2018, 8:43 PM Kiran Ravikumar, wrote:
> Hi Shrinivasan & Bodhisattwa,
>
> The idea of uploading the images to Commons is good, but for WLM it’ll
Hi Shrinivasan & Bodhisattwa,
The idea of uploading the images to Commons is good, but for WLM it’ll be
bad.
As a previous co-organiser of the event and being part of judging team, I
won’t suggest this. It becomes tedious for the first round of filtering.
Going through the same set of images
Hi Shrini,
This is awesome. It is completely okay to upload them to Commons for WLM.
You can add the coordinate of the temple by adding this template - {{Object
location|12.84230695|79.68967944}}. The coordinate has been retrieved from ISRO
website
700 pictures! Wow. You deserve a million barnstars, Shrini. I'd say go for
it as long as the pictures are not repetitive. Sometimes it is important to
have multiple angles of the same object though. Just curious if you're
planning to geo-code some of the as well. But, otherwise, I think so many
14 matches
Mail list logo
