2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Um...how exactly would you amend the contract to anything not agreed with
the Wikimedia Foundation? Isn't it quite obvious that any amendment of the
contract would need to be done in agreement with the other party of the
agreement?
Amendment
2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Sorry, but somehow I fail to understand this.
You're not alone...
- amendments which are agreed by the WMF (- no special resolution needed)
- amendments not agreed by the WMF (- special resolution needed).
and I think the latter category just
2009/3/17 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Andrew: If you say outright repudiation, do you mean termination of the
contract or violation of the contract in force?
Unilaterally saying guys, we don't want to play any more, we're
getting out,
2009/3/17 Tom Holden thomas.hol...@gmail.com:
Fair points, it was late, I was being dozy.
But note they perhaps make Tango’s objection to our original proposed
amendment look just as silly as my new proposed amendment now looks.
If the contract’s only going to be amended in agreement with
2009/3/17 Andrew Turvey ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
We are looking at options to complain about this situation and also options
for accelerating the timescale for applying direct to the Charity Commission
- which needs £5,000 of pledged income first.
Give it a few weeks - if we win the Wikimania
