On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> * Demographics. Who are we targeting with reduced memberships? Is
> there a definable group of people who can't pay the higher fee, and if
> so, is it not being served by the existing two-tier group?
That would be key for me.
I think a £5 ra
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:10 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 19 February 2010 02:01, Tom Holden
> wrote:
>
> > It seems there are quite a few people with quite serious concerns about
> the low rate. I confess this is not something I envisaged when proposing the
> rate cut, so my resolve to push for
On 19 February 2010 02:01, Tom Holden wrote:
> It seems there are quite a few people with quite serious concerns about the
> low rate. I confess this is not something I envisaged when proposing the rate
> cut, so my resolve to push for it is rather diminished.
Suggestion: reduce it to £6, the
