On 21 May 2011 20:10, Brian McNeil wrote:
> Something I stumbled across today:
>
> http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm
>
> So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to
> ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling
> an out-of
I believe the applicable case law is Arkell v. Pressdram.
On 21 May 2011 20:10, "Brian McNeil" wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote:
>> I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio
>> this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name ha
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote:
> I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio
> this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has
> been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in
> enwiki.
Something I stumbled
I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio this
afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has been named in
reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in enwiki.
On 21 May 2011 18:40, "Gordon Joly" wrote:
_
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 18:40 +0100, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 21/05/2011 09:30, Andrew West wrote:
> > Which footballer would that be? Aaah, Wikipedia finally comes to the rescue:
>
> The affair is outed!
The Daily Fail better hope that twitter collapses the Super Injunction
nonsense. We're working
On 21/05/2011 09:30, Andrew West wrote:
> Which footballer would that be? Aaah, Wikipedia finally comes to the rescue:
The affair is outed!
Gordo
--
Gordon Joly
gordon.j...@pobox.com
http://www.joly.org.uk/
Don't Leave Space To The Professionals!
_
