2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Um...how exactly would you amend the contract to anything not agreed with
the Wikimedia Foundation? Isn't it quite obvious that any amendment of the
contract would need to be done in agreement with the other party of the
agreement?
Amendment
2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Sorry, but somehow I fail to understand this.
You're not alone...
- amendments which are agreed by the WMF (- no special resolution needed)
- amendments not agreed by the WMF (- special resolution needed).
and I think the latter category just
2009/3/17 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
2009/3/17 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
Andrew: If you say outright repudiation, do you mean termination of the
contract or violation of the contract in force?
Unilaterally saying guys, we don't want to play any more, we're
getting out,
2009/3/17 Tom Holden thomas.hol...@gmail.com:
Fair points, it was late, I was being dozy.
But note they perhaps make Tango’s objection to our original proposed
amendment look just as silly as my new proposed amendment now looks.
If the contract’s only going to be amended in agreement with
Sorry I missed the board meeting, my computer is playing up. I've come
downstairs to use a college computer and I see from the minutes (which
were uploaded in record time, by the looks of it!) some input is
required from me regarding the motion I proposed (I haven't actually
been emailed about it
Of Thomas Dalton
Sent: 17 March 2009 00:32
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Explanation of Motion to Entrench Chapter
Agreement
Sorry I missed the board meeting, my computer is playing up. I've come
downstairs to use a college computer and I see from the minutes (which
