2009/10/20 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Due to technical limitations, it
won't be possible to have this part of the meeting open to the
public.
Have you considered using a free conference call number instead? That
way people can phone in any way they like, with Skype, or with a
normal
2009/10/21 Angela bees...@gmail.com:
2009/10/20 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Due to technical limitations, it
won't be possible to have this part of the meeting open to the
public.
Have you considered using a free conference call number instead? That
way people can phone in any way they
How does everyone think it went on Tuesday? Personally I found the
Skype part to be much more productive than IRC - it was a lot easier
to discuss potentially contentious and complex issues over Skype than
over IRC.
The main negatives were the fact that it wasn't open to our supporters
to listen
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:56 -0700, AndrewRT wrote:
I notice now there's actually a Skype extra called Pamela for Skype
which can be used to record. It's available as a free 30 day trial or
€18 to buy - something like that might be worth doing, particularly if
we could get one for free!
There
Hi all,
The next board meeting is this evening: Tuesday 20 October 2009,
8.30-10.30pm BST.
The agenda is at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2009-10-20/Agenda
Following from a conversation at the in-person board meeting, we'll
be trying something different this meeting to try to
On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:25, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/10/20 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
That technical limitation. :-) Also, there are concerns about the
required connection speed for hosting a multi-way conference like
this (as I understand it, the calls are all routed through the host
On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/10/20 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
I'm not aware of a way to record a Skype conference without requiring
an external device (i.e. recording the signal to the speaker, rather
than digitally within the computer); if anyone knows a way to
