At 23:20 + 10/2/09, David Gerard wrote:
2009/2/10 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Just out of interest, which other number would you have prefered? Keep
the current 5 or expand to 9?
Five to seven at a *maximum*. Parkinson wrote a good essay on this.
- d.
Indeed.
Gordo
--
Think
At 20:47 + 10/2/09, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/2/10 Andrew Turvey ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
We would like to ask people their suggestions as to the best way forward.
Should we restrict it to current Board members, or is it reasonable to say
that anyone who puts themself forward as a candidate
2009/2/10 Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com:
Why are there seven seats on the board? I can see why there might be
seven roles, but why seven people?
Because we had a discussion (on meta, I think) and that's what we
decided. We thought there was too much work for 5 people and 9 people
seemed
On Feb 10, 8:47 pm, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
It's probably worth pointing out that at the moment less than 7 people
have expressed an interest in standing for the 7 seats on the board,
I don't think we should assume that this will remain the case. Out of
the five current
2009/2/10 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Just out of interest, which other number would you have prefered? Keep
the current 5 or expand to 9?
Five to seven at a *maximum*. Parkinson wrote a good essay on this.
- d.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
2009/2/10 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Just out of interest, which other number would you have prefered? Keep
the current 5 or expand to 9?
Five to seven at a *maximum*. Parkinson wrote a good essay on this.
...which was, for those interested,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
2009/2/10 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Just out of interest, which other number would you have prefered? Keep
the current 5 or expand to 9?
Five to seven at a *maximum*.
2009/2/11 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126901.300-explaining-the-curse-of-work.html?full=true
It's nice to note, that article links to Wikipedia! (The last sentence
links to our article on the English Civil War.) Even New Scientist
endorses us.
