Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Citing wikipedia

2009-02-23 Thread geni
2009/2/24 AndrewRT : > Just reading the news online and came across this article: > > http://euobserver.com/851/27587 > > Look closely and you can see the picture cites "wikipedia" > > I know pictures often cite "AFP" like that - but is this enough under > the GDFL? If not, what is the procedure fo

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Citing wikipedia

2009-02-23 Thread James Hardy
That particlar image is not GFDL, It is (I believe) this image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hpim3526.jpg The license says "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that credit is given and copyright is attributed..", so it is certainly a violat

[Wikimediauk-l] Citing wikipedia

2009-02-23 Thread AndrewRT
Just reading the news online and came across this article: http://euobserver.com/851/27587 Look closely and you can see the picture cites "wikipedia" I know pictures often cite "AFP" like that - but is this enough under the GDFL? If not, what is the procedure for reporting copyright abuses? And

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: ZDNet: IWF on Wikipedia block

2009-02-23 Thread David Gerard
2009/2/23 Peter Coombe : > Thought people might be interested in a new BBC story on the IWF, some > ISPs are not bothering with their filter since they too see it as > ineffective - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7904607.stm > (And of course people without any technical knowledge are jumpin

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: ZDNet: IWF on Wikipedia block

2009-02-23 Thread Peter Coombe
2009/2/20 David Gerard : > 2009/2/20 David Gerard : >> 2009/2/20 David Gerard : > >>> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,100097,39616171,00.htm > >> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/20/1439246 > > > Oh, and is anyone in Cambridge looking for work? > > http://jobs.cambridge-news.co.u