That particlar image is not GFDL, It is (I believe) this image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hpim3526.jpg
The license says "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that credit is given and copyright is attributed..", so it is certainly a violation of Marko Petrovic's copyright. I don't think that the violation is malicious, just them being slighty lazy and assuming the copyright lies with "wikipedia", they are not trying to claim it as their own. Therefore the first thing would probably be to write them an email pointing out their error and asking them to amend the page. James 2009/2/24 AndrewRT <ratur...@yahoo.co.uk> > Just reading the news online and came across this article: > > http://euobserver.com/851/27587 > > Look closely and you can see the picture cites "wikipedia" > > I know pictures often cite "AFP" like that - but is this enough under > the GDFL? If not, what is the procedure for reporting copyright > abuses? > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
