Meetings with a large number of online or teleconferencing participants are
practical, provided those in the aether are receiving but not sending (except
maybe one at a time - for example Email the chair in advance if you want to
pose a question and have the chair dial you in when your slot comes up).
Regards
Jonathan Cardy (WereSpielChequers)
dah...@yahoo.com
--- On Sun, 14/12/08, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Location of AGM
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sunday, 14 December, 2008, 2:10 PM
2008/12/1 Michael Shilliday
mjshilli...@googlemail.com:
I have never commented here before, but why the need
for a physical AGM?
Incorporated companies have been having online AGMs
for years now. It may
be necessary for a small group of people to be sitting
in a room together,
but the voting members don't necessarily need to
be.
There may be a hugely compelling reason why this is
necessary, but that's
just my thoughts,
MJS
Online meetings of large groups of people aren't
practical. If we
wanted members to just vote and that's it, then it
would be fine, but
we would like to actually get people involved in discussion
and
debate. It's pretty much impossible to maintain order
in an IRC
channel with dozens of people talking at once.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l