Re: [Wikitech-l] Making usability part of the development process

2010-12-08 Thread Daniel Friesen
On 10-12-07 04:32 PM, Platonides wrote: Daniel Friesen wrote: On 10-12-07 08:18 AM, Bryan Tong Minh wrote: I was first like wtf as well, but on the other hand this way skin building would be much more accesibles for non-programmer mediawiki users. Regular wiki users

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.17 branched

2010-12-08 Thread Bryan Tong Minh
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote: When you commit or find a revision post-r77974 that you feel should be in 1.17 (bugfixes, typically, no new features), tag it with 1.17 in CodeReview. Also note that if you MFT a 1.18 revision to 1.16wmf4, you should

Re: [Wikitech-l] Removing test suites from trunk

2010-12-08 Thread Petr Kadlec
On 7 December 2010 19:43, Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 December 2010 20:08, Petr Kadlec petr.kad...@gmail.com wrote: Well, the hint to use sparse checkouts applies this way, too… You can omit the testing directories from your checkout, and even subsequent SVN updates

Re: [Wikitech-l] Making usability part of the development process

2010-12-08 Thread Trevor Parscal
On 12/7/10 10:46 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: * Ashar Voultoizhashar+...@free.fr [Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:19:53 +0100]: On 06/12/10 16:57, Trevor Parscal wrote: I personally think XSL is awesome, and would defend it with vigor. I love XSL too. Probably the easiest way to render an XML data file.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Making usability part of the development process

2010-12-08 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org [Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:31:33 -0800]: On 12/7/10 10:46 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: * Ashar Voultoizhashar+...@free.fr [Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:19:53 +0100]: On 06/12/10 16:57, Trevor Parscal wrote: I personally think XSL is awesome, and would defend it

[Wikitech-l] Blocks and XFF headers

2010-12-08 Thread Nakor
Hello, Lately on fr.wiki we have a disruptive person who is vandalizing daily using transparent proxies. We have blocked the IP range he is on but he can still edit using those transparent proxies. With the check-user tolls we can see his IP address in the XFF headers. Would it be possible

Re: [Wikitech-l] Removing test suites from trunk

2010-12-08 Thread Ashar Voultoiz
On 08/12/10 01:39, Platonides wrote: We can provide them gzipped and require them with compress.zlib:// prepended to the filename. Means more CPU usage which is bad for the planet we are living on :-b -- Ashar Voultoiz ___ Wikitech-l mailing list

Re: [Wikitech-l] Making usability part of the development process

2010-12-08 Thread Ashar Voultoiz
On 08/12/10 16:31, Trevor Parscal wrote: I warned that I would defend XSL with vigor :) Magnus wrote a wiki to XML converter a few years ago and I hacked up a small XSLT to convert its output to XHTML: http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/parsers/wiki2xml/php/ Look at test.xml

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Re: [Mediawiki-l] vector components many blank lines

2010-12-08 Thread Andrew Garrett
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.orgwrote: These blank lines should not - under any circumstances - be here. But I do know why they are... Tim Starling modified the standard distribution of JSMin[1] in some good and some bad ways. These blank lines are the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Re: [Mediawiki-l] vector components many blank lines

2010-12-08 Thread Neil Kandalgaonkar
On 12/8/10 3:40 PM, Andrew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Trevor Parscaltpars...@wikimedia.orgwrote: This particular change (the don't delete line breaks part of r73196) should be reverted, Tim's good changes should be pushed upstream, and we should be using a standard JSMin

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Re: [Mediawiki-l] vector components many blank lines

2010-12-08 Thread Tim Starling
On 08/12/10 03:11, Trevor Parscal wrote: These blank lines should not - under any circumstances - be here. But I do know why they are... Tim Starling modified the standard distribution of JSMin[1] in some good and some bad ways. These blank lines are the result of one of these