Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:27:06AM +0100, Krinkle wrote:
Can git notes be changed after merge?
Yes.
Do they show in Gerrit diffs, so we don't accidentally lose them if
someone else pushed an amend without the tags?
No.
At least not yet :-)
Can they be removed after merge?
Yes.
And
On 14 March 2013 01:07, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Wouldn't git notes be a good match [1]?
They're basically annotations attached to commits. You can add/remove
them to any commit without changing the actual commit. And support
comes directly with git, as for
Hi,
Thanks for the many comments on my extensions in gerrit. By now I
handled most of them, but I have a big problem with the image-upload
when creting the API module that should replace my shabby SpecialPage API.
I think that I could use mediawikis fileupload api
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
Hey, Ryan; did you see, perhaps on outages-discussion, the after
action
report
Hello everyone!
Please join us on the next Wikimedia Bugday:
Tuesday, March 19, 15:00-21:00UTC [1]
in #wikimedia-dev on Freenode IRC [2]
We will be triaging bug reports in the LiquidThreads component [3]. The
idea came up on the wikitech-l mailing list [4]. While LiquidThreads is not
If you are developing for MediaWiki and you haven't gone through one of
our security trainings before, this session is for you:
Security for developers training session and QA
by Chris Steipp.
Wednesday, March 20 at 17:00 UTC
I filed that yesterday as bug
46072https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46072.
;)
I'll try to find time to review it before the weekend.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
As some folks may recall, an action=createaccount was added to the API a
On 03/14/2013 04:01 PM, Brad Jorsch wrote:
I've made a first stab at adding support, based on the existing captcha
interfaces for login and editing:
MediaWiki core: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/53793
ConfirmEdit ext: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/53794
Side note, there is also an
On 03/13/2013 08:16 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
A very nice website that does this already is www.forvo.com but they
claim by-nc-sa licence. But the way it works could be used as inspiration.
Forvo looks very nice, and if they can do the job,
I'm happy that we don't have to. We should try
to
On 03/14/2013 05:49 PM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
Forvo looks very nice, and if they can do the job,
I'm happy that we don't have to. We should try
to collaborate with them.
Unfortunately, their license (non-commercial) is not free as in freedom,
and not acceptable for Wikimedia projects.
It's
On 03/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
I strongly disagree that Gerrit is harder to learn than Github. The only
difficult thing to understand is the web UI, which takes only a few minutes
to really get used to. Let's look at the biggest complaints:
Let's not forget about this one:
On 03/08/2013 10:20 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:07:18 +0100, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr
wrote:
I guess the whole idea of using GitHub is for public relation and to
attract new people. Then, if a developer is not willing to learn
Gerrit, its code is probably not
On 03/08/2013 08:55 AM, Andrew Otto wrote:
I've been hosting my puppet-cdh4 (Hadoop) repository on Github for a while now.
I am planning on moving this into Gerrit.
I've been getting pretty high quality pull requests for the last month or so
from a couple of different users. (Including
Hi,
unfortunately en.planet updates are still being stuck.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
The issue is in feedparser.py
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 32:
ordinal not in range(128)
I would really appreciate help on this from somebody
tl;dr
MediaWiki Security Guide
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MSG
PDF or e-book format available
Am 14.03.2013 20:37, schrieb Quim Gil:
If you are developing for MediaWiki and you haven't gone through one
of our security trainings before, this session is for you:
Yes: we have a Virtual
note: this did not happen from the beginning and does not apply to
other languages (or at least not all of them),
so it depends which feeds you subscribe to and their (current)
content. It is not that easy though to identify which feed
causes it, since the update goes through all of them, writes
Its a matter of encoding, see my post on the bug
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Zahn dz...@wikimedia.org wrote:
note: this did not happen from the beginning and does not apply to
other languages (or at least not all of them),
so it depends which feeds you subscribe to and their
On 03/13/2013 08:16 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
A very nice website that does this already is www.forvo.com but they
claim by-nc-sa licence.
Ah, now I see this detail: Yes, the -NC- clause
in their license makes them useless for us.
That's a pity.
Having been through the great license shift
Dear Wikimedia ops team,
The most recent enwiki dump now seems to have finished _almost_
successfully, apart from the dumping of the database metadata tables
such as the pages table and the various links tables, almost all of
which have failed.
I wonder if there is any chance someone could
Στις 14-03-2013, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 23:24 +, ο/η Neil Harris έγραψε:
Dear Wikimedia ops team,
The most recent enwiki dump now seems to have finished _almost_
successfully, apart from the dumping of the database metadata tables
such as the pages table and the various links tables,
I've been hosting my puppet-cdh4 (Hadoop) repository on Github for a while
now. I am planning on moving this into Gerrit.
Why do you want to move it to gerrit then?
Security reasons. All puppet repos have to be hosted by WMF and reviewed by
ops before we can use it in production.
On Mar
Can we please be real here? The reason more contributors come in through
GitHub than through Gerrit is because they *already have a GitHub account*.
My browser is always logged into GitHub, and it's at the point where I can
casually just fork a project and begin working on it, whereas with Gerrit
On 03/14/2013 07:19 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
Like I said before, if you know how to use Git, you know how to use Gerrit
(and the contra-positive is true as well). The primary thing holding people
back is that it's confusing and not user friendly enough to make an account
and get working. Imagine
On 2013-03-14 11:20 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we please be real here? The reason more contributors come in through
GitHub than through Gerrit is because they *already have a GitHub
account*.
My browser is always logged into GitHub, and it's at the point where I can
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we please be real here? The reason more contributors come in through
GitHub than through Gerrit is because they *already have a GitHub account*.
My browser is always logged into GitHub,
?!? Unless you magically had a
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wouldn't be that optimistic, maybe it would slightly increase. Having an
account is one of the factors but I wouldn't underestimate user
friendliness. The first time I tried to find the URL to clone a repo in
This thread has probably reached that limit of fresh arguments. Can we
continue with proper documentation, reporting and patches?
We care about GitHub and we believe it is an important source of
potential contributors. This is why we are mirroring our repos there,
and this is why we are
27 matches
Mail list logo
