On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.com
wrote:
Hrm... I should probably go ask them about that. But I'm curious about
your perspective and to see if we have any information on the bandwidth
On 03.12.2013, 12:30 Ori wrote:
The size of the effect is
substantially smaller on mobile, for some reason, which is surprising.
Mobile simply has fewer modules;)
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
I'd say that is a great idea !
No matter what template you are building, you probably need to output Html,
so this should be suited for core inclusion. We probably should consult
User:Toohool though, who originally wrote the module, with regard to how to
license the code.
DJ
On Mon, Dec 2,
Hi all,
I want to propose a logo for reasonator (to substitute the R now in use);
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reasonator_logo_proposal.png
also, I think that in the mouseover text a more verbose description
like: Show the properties of this item would be helpful.
Ciao,
Cristian
I like it! Can we use the Wikidata color schema, according to the new,
improved trademark policy (R) (TM)?
Cheers,
Magnus
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Cristian Consonni
kikkocrist...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I want to propose a logo for reasonator (to substitute the R now in use);
2013/12/3 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
I like it! Can we use the Wikidata color schema, according to the new,
improved trademark policy (R) (TM)?
((... usual big IANAL disclaimer here ...))
I think so. On Wikimedia sites You may use and remix the Wikimedia
marks on the Wikimedia
OK, now live with the logo! :-)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Cristian Consonni
kikkocrist...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/12/3 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
I like it! Can we use the Wikidata color schema, according to the new,
improved trademark policy (R) (TM)?
((... usual big
I've not been following the trademark policy draft discussion, but note
that Labs is explicitly not part of Wikimedia sites according to the
definition of this (formerly unknown) term on the privacy policy draft:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy#A_Little_Background:
«excluding,
Hoi,
The logo looks fine to me... I already blogged about it [1]. We are also
looking for a logo for the Concept Cloud .. Lydia indicated that there
are more t-shirts that can be shipped for another great design :)
Thanks,
GerardM
[1]
Technically, the JavaScript is just hosted on Labs, but run on Wikipedia ;-)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
I've not been following the trademark policy draft discussion, but note
that Labs is explicitly not part of Wikimedia sites according to
Again, I didn't do anything, it's all Magnus' merit. :) And on it.wiki,
Jalo's and Rotpunkt's.
Andrew Gray, 03/12/2013 13:29:
Would it be worth moving the Reasonator results up to the top right,
in a box? There's a lot of white space on the search page, because the
result snippets are less
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:30:00AM -0800, Ori Livneh wrote:
We ran a controlled test and found that module storage reduced page load
times by 156 ms, on average. Aaron has some data available at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Module_storage_performance, but
we still need to write
To be fair last time I checked there was a lot of dead JS and CSS
(e.g. [1]) that should not be loaded in the first place for every
page. Reducing this should make things even smoother for users.
[1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54604
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Faidon
On 3 December 2013 21:32, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 December 2013 21:26, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
We've put together RC3 for 1.22.0. Please test the tarball and report
any bugs you find on Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/
Here's a question:
On 3 December 2013 21:40, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 3 December 2013 21:32, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a question: is there a set-out list of steps to enable Visual
Editor in this? Or is VE not quite ready for this?
Basically, what would the VE
On 3 December 2013 21:51, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Not ready means not packaged as a 1.22 stand-alone install, and won't
get back-ported security fixes.
If you're happy with VE as it currently operates (which is probably good
enough for an intranet unless you have loads
On 11/20/2013 03:30 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Propose your RFCs for the next review meeting on Wednesday, December 4,
2013 at 10:00 PM UTC in #wikimedia-meetbot
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2013-12-04
This meeting will start in 23 hours. There are no RFCs listed
We have a draft list of project candidates for the next edition of the
Facebook Open Academy program starting... now (planning phase,
development starts in February -- see the wiki page for details).
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Facebook_Open_Academy
If you want to propose a project in this
2013/12/3 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
The logo looks fine to me...
Following a suggestion from a Google+ comment I have uploaded an
alternative (and cleaner) version of the logo here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reasonator_logo_proposal_no_background.png,
On full scale
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 11/20/2013 03:30 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Propose your RFCs for the next review meeting on Wednesday, December 4,
2013 at 10:00 PM UTC in #wikimedia-meetbot
I have just posted a new draft RFC to alter the wfErrorLog() family of
functions to make logged events carry more data and have a common
output format [0].
This RFC was started as a part of the current DevOps related work [1]
being done by the Platform Core team. Ori, Aaron and I would like to
The RFC on third-party components may interest you:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Third-party_components
If we use the Monolog library, which is used in Symfony and others, we can
avoid having to re-implement an entire logging framework.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
The RFC on third-party components may interest you:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Third-party_components
If we use the Monolog library, which is used in Symfony and others, we can
avoid having to
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We'll gradually enable module storage on all Wikimedia wikis over the
course of the next week or two.
Ori deployed this to the live site earlier today :) . For reference,
the original post about module storage is archived at
24 matches
Mail list logo
