Bonjour,
Deacute;butant en domotique, jrsquo;ai eacute;teacute; seacute;duit par le
projet jeedom, jrsquo;ai donc acheteacute; la jeedom mini+RFXCOM pensant
pouvoir reacute;cupeacute;rer le signal de mes volets roulants, du store
banne et de mon alarme.
Je nrsquo;ai malheureusement pour
What URL can I use to search across all languages of Wikipedia (or a sister
project)? Would like to add it as a search engine so that I don't have to
constantly switch between 2-3 language different search engines in the list.
___
Wikitech-l mailing
There isn't a way within mediawiki. however if you use the site trick in
google term site:wikipedia.org you should be able to do it
On Sunday, November 16, 2014, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
What URL can I use to search across all languages of Wikipedia (or a
sister project)? Would
I have just lost *two hours* of work due to an edit conflict. I thought
using my browser's back button would fix it, but the text is gone forever.
Argh.
Pine
*This is an Encyclopedia* https://www.wikipedia.org/
*One gateway to the wide garden of knowledge, where lies The deep rock of
our
Nice. That's results without pictures; could be interesting to have it through
mediawiki or wikibase if that gives such advantage.
John wrote:
There isn't a way within mediawiki. however if you use the site trick in
google term site:wikipedia.org you should be able to do it
On Sunday,
Doesn't edit conflict show your content at the bottom of the edit conflict
page? A bit unintuitive, but should be there.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, at 09:07, Pine W wrote:
I have just lost *two hours* of work due to an edit conflict. I thought
using my browser's back button would fix it, but the
Please endure. That's the way forward now.
For now, technically, there's no known or brought-forth solution, I'll
recommend you endure.
I'm sorry, but that's the reality many people face.
On Nov 16, 2014 10:07 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just lost *two hours* of work due to an
Svetlana: having accidentally tested this feature again, yes. I was
looking in the wrong place for my text, and I copied the wrong portion of
text in my haste to save it. The text is now permanently gone. Judging by
the number of times that I hear about edit conflicts, I have plenty of
company
On 16 November 2014 22:36, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
James: would it be possible to automatically save the text of a page to a
user's sandbox when they encounter an edit conflict? This would overwrite
the content of the sandbox, but that could be reverted using the normal
history page
I have noticed that there are a lot of pages which are extremely well
developed in one language and not particularly well developed in other
languages. I have been thinking about making tools to help identify and
translate these articles. What tools and approaches have been developed to
address
It sounds like the data loss here was purely due to user error, David.
Also, Pine, users do not have a 'sandbox' as far as the software is aware.
Maybe we could allow saving things to a given subpage of their user page
though.
I wonder if there would be issues with this idea due to missing
There's the ContentTranslation project - an extension to help people
translate articles. Among other things, this project has a feature that
suggests people who (probably) know two (or more) languages to write a
translation for an article when there is no article in one of the languages
that they
Well, judging by the number of occurrences of data loss with edit conflicts
and the ease of losing data due to edit conflicts, I would say this is a
design problem at least as much as user error. If I get tripped up by this,
imagine the number of new users who get confused and give up. If this had
On 16 November 2014 22:36, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking in the wrong place for my text, and I copied the wrong
portion of
text in my haste to save it. The text is now permanently gone.
On 16 November 2014 22:58, Zack Weinberg za...@cmu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at
At least we agree that there is a design problem here.
I think blaming users/customers tends to cause unnecessary drama and drive
people away. Yes, I should have read the prompts more carefully and checked
that I was copying offline what I thought I was copying, which was the
wrong version.
On 16 November 2014 22:58, Zack Weinberg za...@cmu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like the data loss here was purely due to user error, David.
Don't blame the victim.
+1. This is precisely the dataloss that needs to be averted.
On the second edit conflict, I read the message at the page top. It says:
Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper text
area contains the page text as it currently exists. **Your changes are shown in
the lower text area.** You will have to merge your changes
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 7:27 PM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On the second edit conflict, I read the message at the page top. It says:
Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper
text area contains the page text as it currently exists. **Your
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for November 10, 2014 - November 17, 2014
Status changes this week
Reports changed/set to UNCONFIRMED: 2
Reports changed/set to NEW: 40
Reports changed/set to ASSIGNED : 55
19 matches
Mail list logo
