On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 08/13/2015 06:09 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 13 August 2015 at 22:30, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oliver, I must be a little blind but I do not see examples of unfriendly
behaviour in this
that is an impressive list, amir. WMF hast its terms of use:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use (TOU) . admitted, an
illegible monster compared to the simple statements below, like
contributor covenant. i honestly do not think that an open movement
like the wikimedia movement should
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 01:00:38AM -0700, Gergo Tisza wrote:
That does not sound like a big deal since we are loading most Javascript
files from our own servers, and can fully control what headers are set, but
we ran into occasional problems in the past when using CORS (MediaViewer
uses
On 16 August 2015 at 04:06, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
that is an impressive list, amir. WMF hast its terms of use:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use (TOU) . admitted, an
illegible monster compared to the simple statements below, like
contributor covenant. i
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
For Wikimedia sites, it is now impossible for proxies or firewalls to
strip headers, after the switch to HTTPS-only. Was this analysis done
before or during the HTTPS-only migration?
The data the 0.1% number is
