You can use wikicode parser mwparserfromhell, and there are some
examples https://github.com/earwig/mwparserfromhell
Pavel
On 11.06.2020 02:16, Hogan (US), Michael C wrote:
Can anyone recommend an example or tutorial that demonstrates how to use
Pywikibot for template parameter maintenance?
Please do not drop the PhpTagsCodeEditor, PhpTagsDebugger and PhpTags
Widgets extensions.
I'm going to do them.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
09.08.2014 16:32, addshorew...@gmail.com пишет:
Great news all!
Some talks at Wikimania got me looking at ALL of the extensions on gerrit,
and thus, some things happened!
We now have zuul / jenkins triggers and jobs for unit tests (non voting) on
ALL extensions on gerrit (excluding empty
, the performance will be even
much higher.
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Magic_expression#How_Magic_expression_works
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Magic_expression#Compared_to_LUA_scripting
13.01.2014 22:37, Pavel Astakhov пишет:
13.01.2014 22:04, Dmitriy Sintsov
Hi, the link [4] was broken:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Jack_Phoenix/A_modern,_scalable_and_attractive_skin_for_MediaWiki_(GSoC_2014_proposal)
18.03.2014 06:34, Jack Phoenix пишет:
Hi all,
I'm Jack Phoenix [1], a MediaWiki developer whose primary interests are
social tools [2] and
Hi all,
Please read and share thoughts:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Magic_expressions
Pavel
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
aren't you lost this links? :-)
1 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki-Vagrant
2 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Z%C3%BCrich_Hackathon_2014
11.02.2014 06:13, Arthur Richards пишет:
A few of us have been discussing how awesome it would be to use
MediaWiki-Vagrant[1] to create a portable
13.01.2014 14:58, Pavel Astakhov пишет:
Hi! I would like to discuss an idea.
In MediaWiki is not very convenient to docomputingusing the syntax of
the wiki. We have to use several extensions like Variables, Arrays,
ParserFunctions and others. If there are a lot of computing, such as
data
even faster.
I did not invent anything new. We all use the html + php. Wiki markup
replaces difficult html and provides security, but what can replace the
scripting language?
I would like to know your opinion: is it really useful or I am wasting
my time?
Best wishes. Pavel Astakhov
From: Dmitriy Sintsov questpc at rambler.ru
Subject: Re: Is Foxway a right way?
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=1389610306.562859.4565.53906%40mail.rambler.ru
Newsgroups: gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical
I implemented something similar before Scribunto was stable enough
and deployed
My idea is different
I know. But the interpreting probably is too slow for huge-load wikis.
Do not allow Foxway extension to deceive you.
It is a cheap intermediary, between functions of PHP and extensions
13.01.2014 22:04, Dmitriy Sintsov пишет:
... exploit the wiki via calling extensions directly. ...
There are no calling extensions directly. Never.
I see that my idea is hard to understand.
I will try to explain everything in detail with examples.
Thank you for the discussion
13.01.2014 23:06, Daniel Friesen wrote:
On 2014-01-13 6:17 AM, Pavel Astakhov wrote:
... Lua VM also was a bit faster than both PHP and Python some year ago.
I know this, but If we rewrite MediaWiki in LUA, it will not work faster.
Actually, not to nitpick... ok, no, yeah I'm going to nitpick
13 matches
Mail list logo
