On 04/06/11 08:51, Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
> On 04/06/11 02:07, Mono mium wrote:
>> I still support.
> Most users do not even know what a 'browser' is. They just look at their
> computer desktop and double click the 'e' icon.
>
We're talking about Wikipedia right, surely we have an article that can
On 04/06/11 02:07, Mono mium wrote:
> I still support.
On a multiple millions visitors per day website, this is unacceptable.
Most users do not even know what a 'browser' is. They just look at their
computer desktop and double click the 'e' icon.
Plus, 'internet explorer' sounds much better tha
> From: wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> [wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] on behalf of Tei
> [oscar.vi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:19 PM
> To: Wikimedia developers
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] IE6
>
> "This site is best v
IE6 support and actively remove it.
>
> From: wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [
wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] on behalf of Tei [
oscar.vi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:19 PM
> To: Wikimedia developers
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] IE6
>
> &
On 6/3/11 5:04 PM, Russell N. Nelson - rnnelson wrote:
> At some point in the future, ops will report that we have had no visitors
> using IE6 in the last few months. Then we can go on a hunt for IE6 support
> and actively remove it.
This may happen but it might be sometime in 2020. We still see
Friday, June 03, 2011 5:19 PM
To: Wikimedia developers
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] IE6
"This site is best viewed with Netscape Navigator 2.0 or higher.
Download Netscape Now!"
http://web.archive.org/web/19961226001115/www.cae.wisc.edu/~agnew/sp/luna.html
It seems that these messages don&#
"This site is best viewed with Netscape Navigator 2.0 or higher.
Download Netscape Now!"
http://web.archive.org/web/19961226001115/www.cae.wisc.edu/~agnew/sp/luna.html
It seems that these messages don't get the point of the web. That is
to let everyone browse the web with whatever is available to
Original Message-
> From: Mono mium [mailto:monom...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: Wikimedia developers
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] IE6
>
> Anyone can upgrade, Chad. It's not hard and any sane IT department
> should have done it six year
Heh, you think?
Deploying a new browser is not a trivial exercise in some large-scale
environments.
And a lot of companies have really useless IT departments (i.e. no budget).
Trust me; we get employed (at vastly greater expense than simply upgrading)
to tell them why their IT infrastructure is
.@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 4:36 PM
To: Wikimedia developers
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] IE6
Anyone can upgrade, Chad. It's not hard and any sane IT department
should have done it six years ago.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Chad wrote:
> We shouldn't throw annoying text/
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Mono mium wrote:
> Anyone can upgrade, Chad. It's not hard and any sane IT department
> should have done it six years ago.
>
That doesn't mean we should punish people that work for a company with
a less sane IT department.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
_
Anyone can upgrade, Chad. It's not hard and any sane IT department
should have done it six years ago.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Chad wrote:
> We shouldn't throw annoying text/graphics at people who
> probably *cant* upgrade.
>
> -Chad
> On Jun 3, 2011 4:27 PM, "Mono mium" wrote:
>> Why not
We shouldn't throw annoying text/graphics at people who
probably *cant* upgrade.
-Chad
On Jun 3, 2011 4:27 PM, "Mono mium" wrote:
> Why not?
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Huib Laurens wrote:
>> Thats completly not the point.
>>
>> 2011/6/3, Mono mium :
>>> We don't want to use Microsoft's,
We shouldn't focus on getting people away from IE. We should stay
neutral and advice people to upgrade.
2011/6/3, Mono mium :
> Why not?
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Huib Laurens wrote:
>> Thats completly not the point.
>>
>> 2011/6/3, Mono mium :
>>> We don't want to use Microsoft's, what
Why not?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Huib Laurens wrote:
> Thats completly not the point.
>
> 2011/6/3, Mono mium :
>> We don't want to use Microsoft's, whatever we do, because it promotes their
>> own borked browser IE9.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Dilley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
Thats completly not the point.
2011/6/3, Mono mium :
> We don't want to use Microsoft's, whatever we do, because it promotes their
> own borked browser IE9.
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Dilley wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Would it be a good community gesture to join Microsoft in trying to
>> e
We don't want to use Microsoft's, whatever we do, because it promotes their
own borked browser IE9.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Dilley wrote:
>
>
> Would it be a good community gesture to join Microsoft in trying to
> eradicate IE6?
>
> http://TheIE6Countdown.com
>
> or to not join th
Would it be a good community gesture to join Microsoft in trying to eradicate
IE6?
http://TheIE6Countdown.com
or to not join them and put up a more general banner
http://IE6NoMore.com
and move on?
On 03Jun2011, at 10:53 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Tim Starl
18 matches
Mail list logo
