2013/4/8 Risker risker...@gmail.com:
Eran raises a key point. On his project, there was a significant
discussion prior to the deployment. Hewiki has voluntarily, as a community,
decided to participate in the early development of a tool. This is a very
good thing, and one that reflects well
On 04/06/2013 09:16 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
By the way, it would be lovely not to call communication like
nationalization... sometimes I see people coming to communities saying
they're socializing something and it feels weird. ;-) (Especially as
it's false good news.)
Sumana Harihareswara, 08/04/2013 14:36:
Nemo, I have sympathy for you here -- it took a while for me to get
used to the use of socialize in the way the Wikimedia communities use
it.
Not communities, the WMF.
I think socializing is more than just communication implies,
though;
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
On 04/06/2013 09:16 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
By the way, it would be lovely not to call communication like
nationalization... sometimes I see people coming to communities saying
they're socializing something and it feels weird. ;-) (Especially as
it's false
I think as long as it's pretty obvious from the context that Wikimedia is
not establishing a sovereign socialist nation, we should be fine with the
current terminology.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com |
Eran raises a key point. On his project, there was a significant
discussion prior to the deployment. Hewiki has voluntarily, as a community,
decided to participate in the early development of a tool. This is a very
good thing, and one that reflects well on the hewiki community.
This process
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the control
of English Wikipedia is a rather big issue, and I would expect to
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the
MZMcBride wrote:
I think the issue we're seeing here is that changes, particularly large
changes, often aren't socialized well.
I mention socialization of features as I'm not sure all of the context is
apparent here. There are brooding factions on the English Wikipedia over
infoboxes, apparently.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:28 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the
In hewiki we had a discussion in village pump before phase II deployment
and there is a simple bureaucratic policy for converting templates to use
the new {{#property}} feature:
a discussion in Wikipedia:Village pump/templates for each template
conversion before actually adding {{#property}} for
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eran Rosenthal eranro...@gmail.com wrote:
In hewiki we had a discussion in village pump before phase II deployment
and there is a simple bureaucratic policy for converting templates to use
the new {{#property}} feature:
a discussion in Wikipedia:Village
By the way, it would be lovely not to call communication like
nationalization... sometimes I see people coming to communities saying
they're socializing something and it feels weird. ;-) (Especially as
it's false good news.)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/socialize
(transitive) To
13 matches
Mail list logo
